A NON-PC ON THE SUBJECT OF

Death chatteringPOLITICAL CORRECTNESS

—which is simply another term for

“If we can’t beat you in open forum—we’ll shame you!”

The Politically Correct (PC) can be easily recognised but in today’s climate not so easily defeated—because logic and rationality don’t come into it. Quite simply, with the PC it’s

  • You are WITH us, or
  • You are against us—
  • —and therefore a target to be vilified, victimised, and/or sent to Siberia.

TOO MANY FOLKS

comply. Without thought or reasoning. Don’t fret—compliance isn’t all that painful once you’ve sold your soul …

THE COUNTER

which the PC desperately loathe and actively campaign against is simply

FREE SPEECH

Which by my definition doesn’t exist anywhere in this world outside of my own home. MY personal definition? Perhaps a bit simplistic:

ANYONE,

MAY SAY ANYTHING,

ABOUT ANYTHING AT ALL

AT ANYTIME.

Gainsayers are entirely free—using words only—to counter any seddits. Words only … (you know, that good old ‘rational argument’ thing); the first to go for a gun reveals himself as an incompetent mindless Thug—

Screen Shot 2019-07-25 at 08.36.21

—and un/common courtesy would of course be a consideration but not an imperative. Now go ahead—present your argument against Free Speech. (Call it Political Correctness, a term which covers a lot of options.)

devil

“Watch it, Dog! The presenters of Holy Writ are my best frontline troopers!”

ye Gods

“Bugger~! I was going to say tha—  … never mind.”

I got only fifty secs into this U-toobe before I fell compelled to make this post—

—and now I can go back to watch it through (and possibly be motivated to a new post).

dodo

(JZ: you might like the vid~!)

CAN’T HELP,

BUT NOTICE

the deafening silence that rises whenever the subject of ‘free speech’ comes up. Certainly everyone is for it, of course, and wouldn’t have it no other way. AND before we go further … lest thee think me a reactionary old MCP anti-global warmingist ‘gay’ bashing wife beating etc etc … I’m not.

Like most I have my opinions. True. Unlike most, I make a genuine effort to listen to both sides of any issue before making judgement (yep. I do judge—a person is a fool to not use his judgement). But—

—can anyone make a fully informed rational decision in today’s socio-political climates? Unless we have Free Speech, no. We need all of the facts before passing judgement; and where half the facts are censored out by panty-waisted feminised limp-wristed brain dead mummy’s child socially adjusted genderically correct unopinionated ‘persons’ who don’t dare even call a lady dog a bitch lest some ‘person’ overhear him/her/it/them and set the social-correctness officers upon them/him/her/it/he/she/they. Oops—where was we? Oh …

Bugger it, I mean (oops, sorry, I meant Oh, bother”)—never mind.

“Mr Argus, Sir!”

“Yes, litt— oops … vertically challenged Mz Virginia?”

“Little will do nicely, Sir—it’s my name after all.”

“My apologies, Miss—oops, ms”

“Miss fits, Sir.”

“Thank heavens, Sweetie.”

“You may be a crusty curmudgeon at times, Sir—”

“Ouch?”

“—but my sister and I love you. Old school, Sir—we trust you. Please don’t ever change.”

SNIFF

So there, you modern wimps and Politically Correct cowards—I shall continue using the Queen’s English (unless she too goes modern) … YEUCH …

WOOF~!.png

THE LADY

SEEMS A DEVOTED

dedicated and hard-at-it principled Christian. Kudos to her … often she’s (unwittingly) in my camp. Here’s a sample of ‘in’—

“There is basically a great wickedness abroad – targeting the innocence of children – to now also  persuade them of a biological lie – that they can now choose to be any sex they wish. This has led to this push for unisex toilets.”

For source: CLICK HERE

FOR MYSELF

I like the idea of status quo where toilets are concerned. On rare occasions when caught short I’ve ducked into Lady facilities and been impressed by the difference. Most blokes, it would seem from such a limited sampling … are pigs. Oink. (I hate standing in puddles to piddle*.)

So~!

May I declare myself here and now as a CT nutcase—

Whence (and why~!) cometh this drive to make all genders ‘one’?

Cui bono?

Screen Shot 2019-08-03 at 18.01.08

Try me, Dude … and stop one!

 

dodododo                                                                      dodo

 

 

 

* Ladies … ya better get used to it.

A CARTOON

THAT I SAW ONCE

in a magazine—sadly the name of the magazine is long forgotten but the pungent cartoon lives on—

PICTURE, if you will, a semi-sozzled hubby arriving home quite late to a scribbled note on the table:

YOUR DINNER

IS IN THE DOG

—and ponder your own probable handling of this kiwi lady’s problem—

CLICK HERE

—the major factor at work here, of course, is our Kiwi desperate need for Political Correctness (and to hell with any innocent) — New Zealanders MUST conform. The approval of their peers overrides any other considerations (like booting his little arse out of bed … or putting his dinner in the dog) …

download                                     dodo

 

TE REO,

Screen Shot 2019-07-30 at 11.43.25.pngor not Te Reo … ?

That be the question.

arrow RH.png

Whether ’tis nobler in the hearts and minds to suffer the machinations of the self-serving PC; or to take arms and by educating expose them? (Why bother …)

NEW ZEALANDERS

must be the most inferiority-complex raddled people on the planet. I state this boldly, being one (and actually proud of it* ).

BUT HIST—

what light through yonder window breaks? ‘Tis ‘education’ …

THE ALMOST DEFUNCT

Maori language is being resurrected. Taxpayer’s funds are diverted towards this truly noble** end—

“Studies show that students who speak more than one language perform, in a number of ways, at higher levels than those who speak only one.”

Sourced:  CLICK HERE

—so I ask:  Why not invest in teaching them something they can apply outside of school? In my youth the “more than one” of choice was French. These days Chinese might easily be the better bet.

I COULD REALLY GET INTO THIS

but it would cost me volumes.

NOW PLEASE EXCUSE ME

I’m off to  see if I can get Saxon or Norman French made compulsory in Britain (and get rid of that silly bastardised doggerel they call modern English).

Here, have a nice resurrected Maori cultural—

Screen Shot 2019-07-30 at 11.42.59.png

—souvenir from the days before postcards became popular. (Tourists took oodles of these home before some Pakeha spoilsports ruined the trade.)

dodo

BOOM BOOM

Sometimes you’d never guess …

** Spoken like a native it sounds like nothing so much as swearing—just try saying ‘Whakapapa’ properly without it sounding like …

PRINCIPLES VERSUS

FREEDOMS …

Screen Shot 2019-05-14 at 10.19.15and now for your quote. Make of it whatever your independent mind/indoctrinations will allow—

Dr Mackereth, an evangelist who now works as an emergency doctor in Shropshire, claims his contract was then terminated over his refusal to use transgendered pronouns. 

He argues that he was dismissed “not because of any realistic concerns over the rights and sensitivities of transgender individuals, but because of my refusal to make an abstract ideological pledge”.

—and this is how The Controllers inveigle their way into power: by harnessing the brute force of the state to serve the ends of power-hungry slime-balls who refuse to allow independence.

It doesn’t really matter a damn (to me) if the ‘independent’ is invoking ridiculous superstitious ‘teachings’—no?

“I care not for what you say, Sir—

But I’ll fight to the death for your Right to say it!”

So. Sure we would … (you and me both, Dude—but we’d be awfully lonely out there).

The quote above in red is from:  CLICK HERE

AN INTERESTING ASIDE

which is of absolutely no relevance—

  • You control speech—
  • you control behaviour*

No? And so we lose by one nibble at a time. That good doctor (above) may well be a Christian nutter, but Christian nutters also have the right to Free Speech.

So let ’em rave! And …

and let anyone narked by their ravings counter-rave; this is the meaning of  ‘Free Speech’.

chimp rocks

dodododo                                                            dodo

* You just try using only politically correct words & grammar yet still present a cogent argument.

AWWW …

giphyDIDDUMS

don’t you fwet, now, you just dwy them pore lil’ eyes—

The University of Otago has apologised after asking its law students an exam question about the ethics of representing a terrorist.

The question led some students to break down and cry during the exam last week after it brought back painful memories of the Christchurch mosque attacks on March 15 in which 51 people were killed.

Sourced:   CLICK HERE

—an’ don’t you never fink there may be a real world out dere, just waiting for ‘oo to be given your lovely new parchment and sally forth in shining armour to reshape it …

and:

And don’t you ever consider that you may one day have to deal with unpleasantness. ( I mean, really,  how can you defend in court some nasty person whose doggy left a dunnit on someone’s lawn?) … ooooooohhhh  … YUK~! (Sob, sniff … WAAAAH!)

images

“Medic!”

“—Coming! … Puff puff pant gasp wheeze … Yes, Mr Argus?”

“There’s another wannabe lawyer over here! Collapsed under the strain of resolving her illusions of human nature with human nature…”

“Oh! Smelling salts or bullet, Mr Argus? Bullet would be more merciful—”

“Salts! A wee dose of Reality might help too—go vandalise her car …”

AND the meek shall inherit the Earth*.

finger-pointing-down

Screen Shot 2019-05-05 at 14.26.02

Stand aside, Wimp! REAL gal comin’ through!

 

* (Six feet of it, cold and damp …)