This in just now—


Screen Shot 2020-06-15 at 08.57.58—what else do you notice about the image? Again, say no more (lest thee be pounced on by irate herds of modern well educated practical philosophers).

BUT do not fret — it’s all simply racist propaganda, staged to sell more newspapers, no? (If not, then who can blame the poor wee souls, lashing out at the systems that oppress them?)

catfiddleWhat do you think? (No, no … don’t tell me, just nod sagely and gobble your Soma. (Or go ask God—He knows what His Great Plan is all about!*) 

And now, do you remember what I said about ‘sheeple’? Or  this one:

Screen Shot 2020-06-13 at 16.47.11


line, turquoise thin

* I certainly don’t …


Cerberus—it’s complicated keeping up with Royal stuffs:

“It is harder to think of a much cleaner break than this. Harry and Meghan are still members of the Royal Family, but they are effectively no longer royal”, the BBC’s royal correspondent, Jonny Dymond, said”

—having recently watched the movie ‘Johnny English’ (again~!) I still ponder the very British penchant for royalty — but if it brings in the punters, who cares?

As a cynic I wonder how long they’ll stay married now—and will ol’ Mr Wossisphace be re-titled when they split? (Actually I don’t give a damn … but my good lady Spouse is English enough to bone me about it, and ‘cos she thinks I know stuff I have to stay usably abreast of  such Earth-shattering events.)

Screen Shot 2020-01-15 at 15.42.27

It’s more fun countin’ the chickens—AND you get eggs



What are you, then—

“You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life” – Winston Churchill


—a bubble, blowing on the breeze?

Don’t mind me … I’ve just watched a u-toobe of Winston Churchill’s funeral (a bit dated now, but very—as it was back then—British).

‘Back then’, of course, meaning pre-PC.






mary3.jpg—OH, GOOD GRIEFFIE!


down eyeface

Apologies for the rush; and here’s your snippet:

line-animated-birds-wire copy 2.gif


Screen Shot 2019-07-08 at 20.18.12.png


line-animated-birds-wire copy 2.gif


—snipped from—


Make of it wot we will.

once read a case for the Wedding at Cana being His Holy Nibs’s very own personal wedding, to one Mary Magdalene. The same author/s made a further case for the Holy Grail being not a cup but the blood (line) of Christ … aka corrupted from ‘le sang real’ (the Royal Blood) (get it?); and the vessel carrying that sacred blood (line) was actually one Mrs J. Christ in the person of Mary Magdalene; transported to the south of France by a Mr Joseph of Arithmathea, who happened to be a tin merchant trader who dealt with (you’ll love this—) tin traders in Cornwall. And who was also JC’s uncle …


You can have a lot of fun if you dabble …


And did those feet in ancient time
Walk upon England’s mountains green:
And was the holy Lamb of God,
On England’s pleasant pastures seen!
And did the Countenance Divine,
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
etc etc
I will not cease from Mental Fight,
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand:
Till we have built Jerusalem,
In England’s green & pleasant Land.
A bit gory in places but sometimes a pleasant enough mythology that serves well to keep the unthinking underfoot and paying taxes.
Screen Shot 2019-07-08 at 23.14.44.png
Regardless of labels, this is a piccie that benefits from lots of looking at and total disregardance of any ‘official’ explanations. Look at that redhead to Jeez’s right—could a case be made for that being Mrs J? (To me it looks more she than he.)
Is there any significance in His Royal Godship and some other guy both reaching for the same buns? And off screen to our left it looks awfully as if someone has a dagger pointed at someone …
Screen Shot 2019-06-29 at 16.45.13
Rubbish! Anyway, there’s not one God, there’s many hundreds, thousands …



dodododo                            dodo                            dodo



or if it doesn’t, there’s one law for ‘them’ (boooo, hiss) and one for US (yay! Boom boom!).

Referring to the vastly over hyped and outdated and outmoded and anachronistic ‘Royal Wedding’ bunfight of yesterday—

(I give ’em a decade at most?)

Oops … where were we … oh, yes. To not digress: some years ago there was a strip in a newspaper somewhere that challenged readers to ‘spot the clue’. In one of them a bearded army officer gives the detective guy (hero! Yay!) a slip of paper with a vital misdirection written thereon.

Clever detective fellow isn’t taken in and ends up nabbing the bugger, so it was win-win for him. So?

So the clue was of course in the beard. At the time UK army officers didn’t have beards, only navy could do that …

So at yesterday’s delightful(?) circus the noble Prince Harry of England wore the ‘full frock-coat uniform of The Blues and Royals‘. I recall the Bs and Rs as being British Army … but do not recall the anti-fuzzface rules being rescinded. A bit of a puzzler, unless the UK army needs wants its Moslems to comply with Allah (first) and a chosen UK military career (second); and graciously permitted His Royal Nibs to retain the Royal ‘Skers.

(But despite being a declared atheist I still had to attend compulsory divine services …)

kismet 1 red



Screen Shot 2018-03-01 at 10.48.46these apples, hey?

“The mystery of why Stonehenge was built on the unremarkable chalk plateau of Salisbury Plain may have finally been solved.

An expert claims two of Stonehenge’s largest stones had been in place at the site for millions of years before Neolithic people built the monument.

Their coincidental alignment with the sunrise and sunset on the longest and shortest days of the year prompted ancient people to construct Stonehenge around them.

Mike Pitts specialises in British pre-history and is one of a small number of scientists who have excavated on the site of the ancient monument…”

To read from source (NZH):  CLICK HERE (or go ask a druid)

I still say them ancients had a rock fetish. Rocks in their heads … rocked out … were

“Mr Argus—!”

(Oops … Little Virginia don’t lets me get away wiv nuffink. She’s no fun …)

And I must admit, that ‘their coincidental alignment’ bit really (as in really really REALLY) appeals to me: I can just imagine ol’ Ug, the hairy caveman, trotting along at dawn one day looking for a bunny for the brekky pot when he unexpectedly notices the alignments (by pure coincidence) … serendipity in extremis, I love it~!

Bugbear big

“Did too! Ya wanna make sumpfink of it?”

No …


Brrrrrr …





pcbut don’t fret. I mean, who could ever trust a source labelled “Russia Today“?

So make of it what we will—

Terrorist recruiters in Europe have been focusing their energies on London and the southern English city of Portsmouth to find new fighters, a study from the US military shows.

According to a study from the Combating Terrorism Centre (CTC), recruiters from Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) and Al-Shabaab, an Al-Qaeda affiliate group, have established strong networks in the two English cities.

Portsmouth and the British capital are thought to attract extremists because their large migrant communities offer easy access to “high numbers of potential recruits who are potentially under social-economic stress.”

—which even if you did think about it in a modern western democracy can’t amount to much.

Think, yes. Speak, no.

Silence today isn’t golden—it’s survival. PC at its best.

The study also revealed that most militants had “basic” formal religious education and that recruiters prefer such volunteers as they are “less capable of critically scrutinizing the jihadi narrative and ideology.”

I love that last line—

cerberus………………………—it means “cannot think for themselves” (as in organic robots).


Just keep on guzzling your favourite tipple for as long as it stays legal— which once the nice Muslims take over (Sharia Law no longer limited to wee enclaves but becoming ubiquitous) won’t be long. We’ll have to trade in our Champagnes, beers, and fine whiskeys, and just celebrate our weddings Christenings Mohammedings and things with bursts of machine-gun fire …

“Mr Argus! Sir?”

“Yes, Little Virginia?”

“Sir … that sounds dangerous?”

“Not really kiddo. They shoot into the air, you see—”

“But surely what goes up must come down, Sir?”

“Of course, Child. But please don’t tell them that~!”


if not indoctrinated by birth environment* why do British young people adopt Islam and toddle off overseas to cut the heads off of disbelievers? Is it an educational failure, is our own ‘culture’ not getting through to them?

Is it because we simply are not allowed in our schools to point out that such behaviour is just a wee tiny bit anti-social?

Has PC tied the already silent voices of the gutless?


  • Born Islamic you’re doomed to a shuttered mind right from the start. (Especially when the erstwhile ‘government’ of where you live ignores the problem.) (The ‘too hard‘ baskets are overflowing, no?)




one Winston Churchill (who was also an artist and successful writer with an acerbic wit) once said—

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die: but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome…

ol' winnie.png—but if he were alive and in the political field today I dare say our modern politicians and the other Politically Correct unthinking cowards would make short work of him. Honestly, I mean to say … how the hell could he get away with such stuff? Sheesh!


Don’t growl at me. I’m just the reporter here, doing my best to get ideas onto the table without offending any basta  body.

That quote, by the way, is from CLICK HERE to go there.

Now go read the final sentence of the quote again …

… then repeat after me: “Naaaaaaa, no way, Dude!” and go line up for your free daily issue of Soma.





are now punishable ‘crimes’.

The man says so in a vid I just watched—which prompted me to break out in a terrible attack of the shi  sieg heils.

One vid led to another, then led me to this—

Wee scamps.png

—which seems to be the sum of many fears. (Actually, if you peruse the web not so much fears as realities.)  Image above from:  CLICK HERE


bare naked propaganda. It has to be. No-one as devout as a member of the World’s Greatest Religion of Peace and Compassion could possibly etc etc etc yadda yadda dribble drip … no? So that proves it: propaganda.

(And if you accept the notion then with a completely clear conscience I hope and (if an atheist can) pray that the Islamic refugees flood into your neighbourhood first. And that they like it enough to stay there. With you …)


you’ll reply in a couple of years to tell me (to crow all over me, in fact) how absolutely delighted you are, and how very wrong my warped twisted prejudices turned out to be.


we can keep our peace and tranquil ancestral way of life by outlawing any and all forms of racial prejudice. If prejudice is based on observation, then anyone reporting any observed breaches of our codes by immigrant refugees (peace be upon them) will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law for inciting hatred.


thinking for yourself only leads to civil unrest, so that too must be banned. By law. With draconian penalties for noncompliances.

Ve haff vays off makink you comply, you Schwein …




but propaganda does—

First Lady Breaks Ground With Muslims

Religion: Mrs. Clinton is first U.S. president’s wife to address them … She urges involvement in American political life.

In a Los Angeles speech hailed by American Muslims as proof they have come of political age, Hillary Rodham Clinton on Thursday … urged them to become involved in the nation’s political life.

She also served notice that Muslims in this country can no longer be ignored.

“Islam is the fastest-growing religion in America, a guide and pillar of stability for many of our people,” she said …

“The values that lie at the heart of your experience as Muslims … are ones that you share in common with others of us who also seek to honor and live …”

To read from source:  CLICK HERE

The above is from a vintage article (1996) concerning a currently hopeful US presidential wannabe.


“Contradictions don’t exist because they can’t exist

wherever you think you have a contradiction check its premises

because at least one of them is false.”

Further down is a quote from a website I came across recently. Once I’d have fully agreed with it. That was before this Truth finally clicked:




with Islam*. Islam is out for nothing less than ‘full spectrum dominance’ and is well on its way to achieving it; this time by slashing the soft underbelly of the west: our values and Freedoms.

The west, too indoctrinated to look for contradictions and too Politically Correct to mention them … allows Islam to gut it alive.

Here’s your quote—

TheReligionofPeace.com strongly condemns any attempt to harm or harass any Muslim anywhere in the world because of their religion.  Every human being is entitled to be treated as an individual and judged only by his or her own words and deeds. 

Succinct, unequivocal.

Now I’d like to insert one tiny word and convert ‘Muslim’ into ‘non-Muslim’ … and listen for the shrieks of outrage from Islam. And there we have our unmentionable contradiction, no?

Again I say, regarding ‘refugees’ by the millions—

the snake we warm in our bosom will bite us


… she said Muslims–like other immigrants before them–are contributing to “a more perfect Union.”

Yeah, right …


* Ref my future posts … you’ll hate them.