A LONE VOICE …

CRYING OUT.

HERE, IN JUST THREE BITES

sans any form of commentary

“… In order to deal with Islam intelligently, we must understand the doctrine. The common assumption is that Islam is a religion, but religion is only one part of its complete civilization which also contains a culture and its own laws.

Religion is about answers to what happens after death, but we only need to understand how Islam impacts non-Muslims in this life today, mainly through its Sharia law. I call the Islam that affects the non-Muslim (Kafir) – political. We see from Mohammed’s life that he started preaching a religion. He was largely unsuccessful so he emigrated to Medina where he became a politician and a jihadist and was a great success.

We can see this division in Sharia texts which concerns religion, business law, family law and criminal law. For example, jihad is both religious and political. The Sharia is “Allah’s” law and is superior to Kafir laws. Since the Sharia makes constant demands on the Muslim immigrants’ host country, it is important that our leaders understand what it is. The concept of Islamic politics allows our leaders to see the demands as just that—political demands that must be rejected when they contradict our laws…”

Okay, so I lied a wee bit. I did comment, but only by a little editing in the form of simple spacing. Sue me … quote above taken with thanks from:

 

Advertisements

GUN LOBBY &

MOSQUE MURDERS

Does it all boil down to a battle for control—in the end?

The ultimate control: reduced to brute force, superstition, and pignorance?

So in the end which is mightier—the hand holding the gun or the hand that rocks the cradle? (Religious folks inspired by the Old Testaments please note—I said ‘rocks’, not stones) (as in verb not noun).

IS ALL THIS ‘RELIGIOUS’ CRAP

really just an extension of the ages-old Battle Of The Sexes?

Wannabe men who are really slaves to superstitions resurrected and maintained for political control (Power! Aaaaahhhh …) versus people who although soft and fluffy (hah! You wish—) are actually quite clever and quietly biding their time?

I should know. I’m an expert … I married one (see? I told you they were clever!) and have kept my eyes open for these past decades.

NEVER FORGET,

o’ clever person, that your enemy must sleep sometime, and the snake you warm in your bosom will sting you halfway across the river (bugger! Mixed ’em up again …)(stupid proverbs) (sheesh!).

SO ARE MUSLIM ‘MEN’

not only pignorant but so desperate to retain whatever it is that turns them on that they must keep ‘their’ wimmin tucked away, out of sight, and in black bags?

Are we so stupid as to allow them to bring their ancient cultures with them to our benighted lands and nations?

Don’t ask me—Im just a dum dog with better things to do—

—such as watching a rather irate Miss Truth climbing out of history (and mighty grumpy she looks too). Now, I’m off—more important things beckon …

 

SPOOKY, HUH?

So:

for all you blasted Realists and Rationalists and otherwise atheistic/agnostic cynics out there—cry “Raspberry~!” and let loose the dogs of ire.

In other words, learned fellows, try to enforce an open mind. (Open, I said … not empty. Tut~!)

DO SCIENTISTS

have all the answers?

No.

Neither do the religious, the superstitious, the rational, the credulous, the incredulous, and anyone I may have missed. Nobody does (except me, but I don’t count—nobody listens to a dog …)

MY PREVIOUS POSTS

were about one Edgar Cayce and the disproportionate effect he has had/is having on modern Egyptian archaeology. You can Google the name and explore the topic for yourself, I’m more tied up with the here and now—and my own ‘here and now’ sadly moves over in the boat to make room for the above quote from Hamlet.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED

things that I cannot explain rationally—but by the same stroke of the brush I cannot accept ghosties, spooks, spirits, shades, wraiths, phantoms, gods, angels, and things that go ‘plop~!’ in the night for no reason.

TELEPATHY

being one of them. Precognition being another. Take my word for it (or not, ’tis all the same to me) —I know what I know, and having run it through all the conventional filters am happy to accept that there are indeed “more things” etc etc.

BUT WORDs TO THE WISE

• do your own research
• don’t take anyone’s word as absolute
• always doubt—

—doubt your own senses, distrust your own eyes, and when all else fails just keep on asking. Any reasonable stage magician can help you with your homework.

CREDIT WHERE DUE

Ol’ Cayce was a very clever man. A man who if right is denied the acclaim he is due—if wrong has no damned credibility to direct control of the Giza Plateau in modern Egypt.

I understand that Cayce also claimed there was/is a “Hall of Records” from ancient Atlantis under the front starboard paw of The Sphinx.

I understand that some enthusiasts with echo sounders and other scientific stuffs agree that indeed, there is a void of some kind in that location … I also understand that Hawass and his cronies will NOT permit independent excavation there. (You can see why, of course, a tiny exploratory hole dug there might cause the entire Sphinx to collapse … it is, after all, thousands of years old.)

 

 

FREE THINKING~?

THEN HOW VERY SICK

is this—     

Come on, come on~!

Make your own mind up, dammit: does ‘free speech’ have room for ‘anti-blasphemy’ laws? Or not?

Oh, really?

I STATE HERE THAT

any country with any (repeat) ANY manner of ‘anti-blasphemy’ law is not a free country at all. And arguably never was …

(or if it were, then it was a little too free~?*)

… certainly never shall be. No?

(How come nobody ever challenges my points of view? Booooooriiiiiing …)

* Yes, Little observer—that was indeed a trap. (Great that you spotted it—take a few points and help yourself to a chocolate fish.)

PS Dammit, I missed ‘Blasphemy Day’ …

 

THE VIRGIN SAID

… (it) WOULD ALL COME TO PASS

IF

HER WORDS WERE UNHEEDED …

Well now.

She didn’t know?

“If”?

DWELL A BIT ON THAT ONE

it is so absolutely riddled with naive ignorance.

MYSTIFIED?

Don’t be:

—perpetual virgin appears

—to three unknown little scruffs

—in a backwater nowhere

—to tell them, in terms that mean a fait accompli

—that humanity has a chance …

—to avert the inevitable.

Yeah, right, I think I’ve got it. (I’m also wondering how she’s still a virgin after giving birth to all his brothers and sisters and The Great God Almighty) …

Can you imagine a Brit army sergeant (old school) with his clipboard doing a stocktake of the Holy Family?

“Virgin Mother, one in number?”

—check!

“Son, God, in person, nailing up to Save Mankind for the use of, one in number?”

—check!

“Mortal, carpenter, cuckold, nominal father of the Son of God; one in number?”

—check!

“Brothers and sisters of God incarnate, two each being four off?”

—check!

So, you poor perplexed victim—if you’re wondering what provoked me this time, get thee hence to this 

You’ll find the Fatty bit at around minute 5:50-ish.

—and ponder:  “If her calls were unheeded”

Oh, spare us!

I love that “if”  …  don’t it, just?

“Hey, Argus … please don’t tell them that just one genuine prophecy in the entirety of history blows the case for any notion of Free Will!”

 

 

A BRIEF FLURRY

OF COMMENTS

on another’s blog touched upon the rather touchy untouchable we all know/admire as Political Correctness. Call it PC — and whether good or bad I don’t give a BRA (don’t twitch—no reference to feminine underwear: Big Rat’s Arse) (ass to you Americans).

FREE SPEECH?

So if you think it—say it!

Get off your butt, state it out loud. In words you actually use. Go on … you know you want to …

IF YOU GOOF

and are wrong some indignant sheeple will rush to correct you. Ya gotta comply. But any twat shrieking “PC” and calling for his/her/its Mommy*

“Mr Argus! Sir!”

“Yes, Little Ollivia?”

“Sir— mommy and daddy are sexist terms—”

“Oink?”

“—you must adapt to the times! You aren’t allowed genderical language these days … you mean only ‘Parent’ or ‘Parent’!”

I stand corrected and am shutting down this post write now. I really really don’t want to offend no-one: from my blog no brain-dead gutless easily convinced mindless soggy-trousered un-opinionated panty-waisted dormant oaf need ever depart offended.

 

 

 * If anyone can tell the difference in that household …

 

BUT WAIT~

IT GETS BETTER—

your quote:

Meanwhile for National Geographic the rebel of choice in 2017 was US geologist J. Harlen Bretz, condemned to pariah status in the 1920’s for daring to propose that a gigantic flood had scoured the “scabland” of America’s Pacific Northwest near the end of the last Ice Age.² It was an idea that contradicted the consensus view of scientists at the time that geological transitions were always slow and gradual – a view in which there was no place for sudden and cataclysmic earth changes.

And now your quiz:

Did you note “condemned to pariah status” and “it was an idea that contradicted the consensus view” and “at the time”?

If you did, well done! You certainly don’t need read any more. But if you missed, here’s another chance: go to the referenced source—

FOR REFERENCED SOURCE:                  CLICK HERE

—then setting aside all other preconceptions, and with an open mind, plough on through. Try it, you may like it—

In March 2017 the National Geographic Society and the Smithsonian Institution, those bastions of scientific orthodoxy, highlighted the remarkable achievements of two scientific rebels, one retired and the other deceased, confessing that multiple injustices had been done to both and that the “toxic” way in which they had been treated by their professional colleagues had “poisoned” scientific progress.

Oh dear …

BUT WAIT~

IT GETS BETTER—

though only if you can approach with that open mind. My thesis is that ‘knowledge’ per se is a moving target, a fashion statement that changes shape with the tide.

How so?

BECAUSE OF

(wait for it~!) human nature.

This is a point I have made before; that no-one who has worked hard, studied hard, and invested a great deal of money/sweat in gaining status is going to stand by and watch some pimply newbie come up with something that will not merely rock the boat but sink it.

Hence—

—when all else fails: scorn, ridicule, contempt; and the shutting off of access to relevant importances in the field(s).

“You!” screech the threatened, “Are with us, or against us!”

—and the lines are drawn. No half measures.

Thus access to essential resources under the iron control of the Establishment is either cut off completely, or controlled to the point called censorship.

Science is often not (r) NOT an ‘open mind’.

Knowledge is too often a rigidly enforced monopoly. You need to be ‘in the club’ for access to resources; and you cannot be in the club without paying due homage to the gatekeepers.

BUT WAIT~

IT GETS BETTER—

my simple question is … how much progress would be made if there actually existed a genuine ‘spirit of enquiry’?

DON’T LOOK TO ME

for answers. I’m a conspiracist outsider, remember?