even if he is atheistic towards the fastest growing major religion. (I love where he explains how the Spanish have devised a way to make their solar-power farms productive by night—pure genius!)
Be warned, I think he’s Australian.
And he makes sense.
I especially love that he makes no bones about stating that the ‘Climate change’ thing is simply another religion. (What might happen to the home of Islam, which reaps its loot from both oil and religion?) (Conflict of interests?)
Go there, watch him — and just see if I’m right.
Your new Madonna icon,
practising for her ‘Madonna Lisa’ portrait.
“Some call it the consummation of trends of global warming … hey, you on the end there—Miss Greta, what do you call it?”
“I call lunch, Chief: professionally now, but with an eye to my future later …”
DON’T FRET, MISS GRETA
this is ‘Climate Change’ propaganda
from a bit before
you were born.
State of the art thinking, though …
Now meet an optimist who is happy to read cheery stuff like that—
—and don’t you just love these cute little bears, now so terminally close to absolute total extreme extinction? How close? Don’t ask, you may just be a little surprised …
TO BREAK FREE OF
Miss Greta Thunberg and the whole new Anthropogenic Global Warming Religion. But I can’t. Not when stuff like this keeps popping up:
Face it … someone, somewhere, is MILKING this rather disturbed kid; and when she’s been sucked dry she’ll be spat out.
And so the beat goes on … world without end; as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be etc etc … with this popular new religion* replacing the old in one foul swoop. Saint Greta? Why not?
If that’s what it takes her manipulators will do it; and if she burns out in the process that’s even better—martyrs are in such short supply these days.
* Saving the planet from climate change.
visible to all …
“Whaddya got there, Sybil?”
“My illustration projecting ‘evolution’, Mr Darwin, Sir.”
FOR MISS GRETA
AND ALL WHO
sail her—so dry those tears, we have it in hand …
JUST WRAP YOUR MIND
around this one if you seek solace:
Hot or cold? It’s so hard to keep up with shifting targets. Anyway, this is given us by real Scientists (and they should know—they’re experts.)
I’m off now to flash up the barbecue and savage some sausages while trying desperately not to dread climate changes. (Dammit, I confuse easily—am I still to paint my roof white, or should it now be black?)
how the religious feel
when their beliefs are being denigrated …
I refer to the parallels between Global Warming Alarmism versus the (misnamed) Climate Change Denial*; many of whose practitioners are vociferously anti-The One True Faith.
The above is simply a way of saying that both sides have fervent believers very set in their ways. Both teams also have
God (oops) Science on their side, and both can spout endless texts, relics, and accredited Prophets to prove their case.
the damned denialists are low key compared to the Alarmists. Just like religion we mere mortals are threatened with annihilation and eternal damnation if we don’t recant and cross over—before it is too late. Actually, according to some prophets it’s already several hours past midnight.
The one thing the Alarmists won’t do is step back and actually practise what they preach. Just as with Abrahamic religions, it’s a case of
“Do as I say! Not as I do!”
if we don’t promptly turn over the means of production and distribution to their absolute control:
- You’re a BLOODY DENIER, and
- given half a chance
- they’ll send in the heavies.
Be warned: in times to come it could get a little rough (religious wars are the worst kind).
BUT FOR NOW
all is still sweetness and light, and will stay that way until the cuts start biting. Here, have thee a nice agnostic—
—some of her imagery is well worth a peep—
—make of it what you will.
Now have yourself a wee Alarmist prophet—
—who kept ‘wagging’ school to lecture Grown Ups about why we (sinners) are all murderous pigs.
above, between, below.
IF clever enough a person might ‘guide’ polarisations into movements—and thereby garner great wealth and power.
Or at least get the smug satisfaction: I alone have Truth.
So: how may we discern Truth? How may we separate sheep from goats, gullibles from their moolah?
OR IS IT BETTER TO
just pick a flow and go with it? Better then to flow with a religious fervour—which means: shut your mind to the outside possibility that other folks might just be ‘right’.
And once polarised our average punter stays polarised. Now just you try prising open such a mind:
“Hey, Christian … can I interest you in Allah?”
“Hello, little ‘Anthropogenic Heat-death Global Warming’ person … can I interest you in natural—”
… so how can we get ’em before they are polarised? Ouch. All anyone can do is offer a tool—
—a tool for thinking.
But: try to get a convinced believer (in anything) to actually use that tool. Going with the flow is ipso facto easier than any inconvenient truths.
Yes, we polarise.
We pick a label, right or wrong, and fight for it if need be. Hence great wealth (and power) changes hands and too often We Gullibles die while serving the ungrateful unscrupulous … when just a little independent thought could mean stepping away from polarisation and thus change the course of history.
Now consider the Law of Contradiction* .
(And then try using it …)
* Contradictions cannot exist—in any apparent contradiction there’s always a false premise.