“… Good memories from past lives can be awakened and great things can happen. To be able to fly, you must awaken the bird memory. Most people have these memories buried too deep to access. Levitation and flying is our birthright, stresses the Avatar Paramahamsa Nithyananda …”

—I would ask nice man to demonstrate. No, no, Silly Person … demonstrate the flying part is all I ask.

Your link:

down eyeface

… and before you ask, I didn’t watch it.

I just quoted from the guff … my current incarnation is too brief a candle, no?

Screen Shot 2019-04-07 at 19.05.49





don’t you fwet, now, you just dwy them pore lil’ eyes—

The University of Otago has apologised after asking its law students an exam question about the ethics of representing a terrorist.

The question led some students to break down and cry during the exam last week after it brought back painful memories of the Christchurch mosque attacks on March 15 in which 51 people were killed.

Sourced:   CLICK HERE

—an’ don’t you never fink there may be a real world out dere, just waiting for ‘oo to be given your lovely new parchment and sally forth in shining armour to reshape it …


And don’t you ever consider that you may one day have to deal with unpleasantness. ( I mean, really,  how can you defend in court some nasty person whose doggy left a dunnit on someone’s lawn?) … ooooooohhhh  … YUK~! (Sob, sniff … WAAAAH!)



“—Coming! … Puff puff pant gasp wheeze … Yes, Mr Argus?”

“There’s another wannabe lawyer over here! Collapsed under the strain of resolving her illusions of human nature with human nature…”

“Oh! Smelling salts or bullet, Mr Argus? Bullet would be more merciful—”

“Salts! A wee dose of Reality might help too—go vandalise her car …”

AND the meek shall inherit the Earth*.


Screen Shot 2019-05-05 at 14.26.02

Stand aside, Wimp! REAL gal comin’ through!


* (Six feet of it, cold and damp …)



—yet they cast it out?


—now here’s your quote-of-the-day:

“A Lego enthusiast is packing up his toys and going home as a dispute of biblical proportions brews over a potentially controversial display.

Lezle Luketina-Johnston created a series of 12 well-known Bible stories and was surprised and offended when BrickCon New Zealand organisers asked him to tone them down.

The organisers were concerned about five of the 12 scenes that contained a naked Adam and Eve and other naked figures with Lego-tile bricks acting as breasts.

There was also a bloody scene of David’s defeat of Goliath,  Abraham about to sacrifice his son on an alter with a knife and a soldier in King Solomon’s court about to cut a baby in half.​”

To read from source      cat walking RIGHT.gif     CLICK HERE


they are offended by the imagery but not by the documents/systems that inspired it? Damned one-track heathens … shouldn’t be allowed … or—

—or (horrors!) perhaps this was the only way the atheist swines could protest the Great Work Of peace, love, compassion, and Justice?

A thought— “david’s bloody defeat of Goliath” … did David bloodily do that of his own Free Will, or did God know millions of years in advance what the inevitable outcome would be—and could not a peace loving compassionate God have had them simply toss a coin to decide the outcome?*

And did He really have to send a man in a dress and feathers to shoo them out?

Screen Shot 2019-06-01 at 17.47.36.png


I see …

… it was a bit ‘infra dig’ for Him to do it person. In Godson. Himself—

“Mr Argus, Sir?

“Yes, Little Virginia?”

“Point of order, Sir—there’s actually three of Him in the Divinity Trinity, Sir.”

… Bugger … dammit:  move over, A and E, I’m coming with you …

Screen Shot 2019-04-16 at 10.08.04


(Oops … now I’m for it … hope the fire insurance is up to da— )

“Cool it, Dog! You’ll be getting them thinking next!”




* Hell … with a precedent like that the Yanks would never have had to nuke Japan either; and who knows, perhaps even Troy might still be trading?



1. True

2. True.

3. True.

So whaddya gonna do about it? Carry on as we are, or try something different? The old saying is (UK armed forces rings a bell) “Give us the tools, and we’ll do the job!”

At the risk of offending sensitivities across your readership what we’re doing thus far is ‘mental masturbation’ (provides a moment’s satisfaction but doesn’t get anyone fu— pregnant).

What we need to do is cut to the chase and hack away the roots, the foundations.

Quite simply you/we won’t get anywhere worthwhile by scoring points against the demonstrably insane.
We need to demonstrate that they are insane (can’t be done, can it …) or inoculate the upcoming generations by giving them the tools with which to think for themselves.

Again I bleat about the Rule of Contradiction … if nothing else.

But you’d be hard put to find any contradictions in ANY religion, or between/among religions; so I guess we’re stuck with the status quo. (Yes, Little Virginia, that was indeed …)

So give the kids the God-damned tools, no?



And may God protect you and all who sail with you …

chimp rocks


Ram right

Ram left



from God (via a fellow blogger) …

down eyeface

… that all is not in vain!

With grateful thanks to Scottie for—

“Hello Ark. Lets think about this god they worship … this god knew everything before he made anything. He knew who would repent, who wouldn’t, who would go to heaven or be sent to hell before he made a single person. We are also told this punishment of tormenting hell is forever, all time, never ending. So god knows you will not be saved, creates you , lets you live for a short period of time a normal human life lasts, and then sends you to everlasting horrible painful punishment that never ends for billions on billions of endless years! Just for not kissing his ass and worshiping him correctly enough? …”

Uplifted from:  CLICK HERE 

It’s one loophole that no amount of desperate religiosi damage control could ever hope to fix or ignore … viz:




negate any claims ever made for His goodness.


Simply:  God ain’t good


If we have to spell out out in terms that even a squelch of simpering slug-slime might understand—

Anyone creating people that He knows will be

  • incinerated alive
  • in blazing warships, tanks, houses, aircraft, forests, oilfields, hospitals, etc
  • or sent as smoke up chimneys—or
  • drowned slowly in icy waters, or
  • eaten alive by bears or hogs or ants or parasitical worms
  • or suppurated to death by plague or medical failures, or
  • burned at the stake for daring to think, or
  • stoned to death for being stupid enough to speak, or
  • etc etc ad endless infinitems …

—is undeniably more the ultimate sadistic Prick than a kindly, loving, compassionate, infinitely merciful (etc etc—you know how it goes; just lay it on thick) benign Holy Spirit. No?

It’s obvious that the omnipotent omniscient is undeniably also the omni-responsible. There can be no alternative (although dupes will desperately bleat otherwise).

I now await with relaxed anticipation the first turkey to bleat about the ‘Free Will’ thing (unless it’s a tongue in cheek mention) (I mean, what else could it be?)


we deal with dupes. Dupes who have been doubly duped and not only bought the con-man’s bait but swallowed it.

I await rebuttal.

I await rebuttal.

I await rebuttal.

I await rebuttal.

Dammit …

… I still await rebuttal.


Take this post as my challenge* .

And yes:

gloves off — let’s get up close and personal—nothing barred~!


dodododododododododododo dodo        dodo

* Awwww, go on—do it. (You know you’d love to … if only you had the ammo.)



this will be my last post on the impossibility of Time Travel.


simplistic look, using a snippet

“Readers were quick to catch on that the people Moberly and Jourdain saw may not have been ghosts … the two women may have slipped back in time to the late 18thcentury, shortly before the French Revolution … Perhaps there was a momentary rift in the space-time continuum in the area?”

—as a starting point.

First, to not digress … here we have two Victorian ladies who ostensibly through no fault of their own slipped into the past. Brrrr~!

But what about the mechanics of it—

  •  did the ladies travel backwards in time, or
  •  did the whole planet*  travel forwards?

Let’s take the simpler approach:  they travelled.


In naval gunnery a host of factors is taken into account: the gun is on a ship, the ship is tossed by the ocean and manoeuvring  … and, for what it’s worth, the planet itself is revolving on an axis (which is moving around the sun which is speeding through the cosmos—not so relevant for gunnery but very much so for Time Travellers). 


Some factors may be ignored but not the cosmic ones. I can’t be bothered doing the sums but for the ladies to have stepped back in time a century they’d have travelled at least as far as the planet moves in a hundred years. (And back!)


—unless it was their consciousnesses that experienced the ‘timeslip’. To have slipped physically would have reshaped history—past ‘facts’ would no longer be facts, they’d be replaced by ‘new’ ones … brrrrr.

In short—

—for the ‘slip’ to have happened at all it would have already happened before anyway, and been in place since the dawn of time, just waiting there for them to reach it. Again.


there never could have been a ‘first’ time …




* And thus the solar system entire, etc



Screen Shot 2019-04-28 at 18.11.44.pngand other points of interest.

Moving on  finger-pointing-down

Concerning moi, I am left-eyed.

Yup~! Mine left eye is my dominant eye.


So: the few times in my life that I’ve been privileged to try my hand with bows and arrows I’d done it wrong.

And well may the patient experts try to correct me, it is, as we say, like spitting in the wind—

Mock on, Mock on, Voltaire, Rousseau;
Mock on, Mock on, ’tis all in vain.
You throw the sand against the wind,
And the wind blows it back again   …

—which don’t get no-one nowhere. I is me, and even though the mind commands the physicals it just doesn’t feel right … and so I ‘olds me bow in the wrong ‘and, Guv, and that’s the end of it (snort).


Mine arrows go where they want to, dammit.  In fact, when I’m shooting the safest place (the only safe place, actually) is right in front of the target with an apple on your head.


So why should I have such a strong instinct for holding a bow? Is this some kind of legacy transmitted to me in someone else’s future, could it be a lingerment via karma from my own pre-birth past? Born again, to again lose the shafts I loose if there’s any long grass around?

I pulled in a u-tube vid with this shot in it—

Screen Shot 2019-04-28 at 17.33.23.png

—and noted that every bugger there is holding his bow wrong.

Wrong, according to The Gospel Of Argus— but there ya go. So why, really, should I have this instinctual urge to do it “incorrectly”, hmmmm? (Unless it is something to do with being left-eyed—which never, however, affected my riflemanship).


A bit of a toughie …

Anyway, the image above burgled from—

—here. (And you’ll never guess what attracted me in the first place …)

CLUE:  sure wasn’t the scruffy Samurai bowmen~!