—lead to misunderstandings, and
can lead to mistakes—which can further along the track escalate into real unpleasantness.
ONE OF THE TOOLS
to help prevent such would be to get away from ‘newspeak’ and atully apply the lingo the wai it were writ and wunce tort at shool. Skool, bugger, now im too also doing it as well…
SO WE QUESTIONS
all and dont’ except modern twists and turns which are programmed by knaves to entrap the
fools innocents. try this on for size—
—which I pulled in this morning from New Zealand’s once mighty (and definitive~!*) ‘New Zealand Herald’.
My impression is that it was sourced from overseas and accepted on faith value, and simply rerun as a filler/grabber. Could be wrong~?
It’s quite redundant that the guy who shot her is now an ‘ex’ boyfriend … but if all is accurately reported and truthful, the lassie in that snap doesn’t look overly suicidal or even worried. It doesn’t look to me as an ‘ex’ relationship.
Suicide? One could ask why someone about to die (knowingly) would be taking photographs … but that’s just the bitterness in me coming to the surface. So relaxed, too. Great actress.
BUT NOBODY CAN CLAIM
accident, can they? He shot her in the back of the head—she’d have dropped on the spot, as-is where-is … and ‘once between the eyes’?
So he flipped her over …Why? (Dumb question: so he could shoot her between the eyes, of course.) (Sheesh.) After which he nonchalantly shoved her over the edge.
ONE OF THE PENALTIES
imposed back in the days of sail for murder aboard a ship at sea was for the transgressor to be tied to the deceased and both thrown overboard whilst under way. I like it.
concludes with the now mandatory homily, words to the effect that ‘if you have mental problems help is always at hand’. Sweet.
So how flexible are the US ‘justice’ systems?
“A court initially ruled Bunner would be tried as a youthful offender, which would have meant he could have served a maximum of just three years behind bars.”
ISN’T IT TIME THAT
we in the western world damned well stopped being ‘nice’ and bending over backwards for people who run around being anti-social? (Oubliette springs to mind …)
* * * *
* But that was back in the days when they had proof readers (professional nit-pickers who questioned all and accepted nothing on simple say-so. All gone now, and the world is a sorrier place).