RECENTLY

A COMMENT

dragons17in someone’s post used the expression “historical guilt” — as if history is something to be ashamed of or feel guilty for.

For myself:

I refuse to accept blame for anything I haven’t done, anything that I

  • have had no input to or control over,
  • nor involvement with;
  • and wasn’t even alive at the time.

SURE, I AM

British. And at times proud of part of my heritage, proud of what other people only vaguely connected with me achieved—proud almost as though I’m entitled to some of their glory; which obviously I’m not … no more than I’m entitled to any part, however minuscule, of their guilt or blame. This may help explain why many modern Germans refuse ‘ancestral blame’ for Adolf Hitler and some of his generation’s misdeeds. Rightly so?

So:

do YOU accept “historical guilt” as applying to you?

IF SO

I’d declare you to be an excellent hypnotic subject (in all probability one who votes in elections)(for someone, anyone; maybe even the perceived best* of a bad bunch … so long as you do your ‘duty’ and vote.) I don’t vote …

I would vote if I saw

(a) any point, and if

(b) there were someone actually worth voting for. Meantime,

I DO NOT ACCEPT

UNEARNED GUILT

—and if you do …

… what the hell are you doing reading me?

 ARROW DOWN.png

SHEESH!.png

* It too often means the least bad … for myself, IF  I were ever to vote again it would only be for someone I actually wanted. Wanted, that is, on rational grounds—not the one who trumpeted the loudest and/or screeched the most (recycled) promises; or was the least bad of a disgusting two-faced mealy mouthed bunch of confidence tricksters.

Advertisements

CORRECT ME ONLY

IF YOU CAN

(Clue:  you can’t.)

This in tonight

“Putin has long worked toward restoring a Soviet-style empire, and if his power, his theft of democratic processes is allowed to continue unchecked, the world becomes a lot less safe.”

—forcing me to ask “Wot wot, eh wot?”

Admittedly ‘democracy’ is better than blatant dictatorship. Sort of … but I’ve not yet been challenged when I state about political systems, that—

 

“Democracy:  is when we go the polls every X years,

to elect our dictators for the next X years.”

 

So we ‘democratic’ folks proudly possess elected dictators—compared to unelected dictators. As the ghost says in that movie, “Big fleshy deal!”

Some genius once stated that “Democracy is the very worst possible system—except for all the others …” (Churchill?) (Does it matter?) So—

NO MATTER WHAT BIRD

gets elected he/she/it will move to establish (as best he/she can) permanence (or as far as possible, longevity) after which nest-feathering takes precedence.

And We (being us … the Great Unwashed) are simply shelved until the run-up to the next election. Not that we mind.

I’m not sure but I think I’m quoting a ‘Wizard of Id’ cartoon here …

“Hey, you—Lackey!”

“Sire?”

“Elections coming up … how many of those promises I made last time did I keep?”

“None at all, Sire!”

“Great! I can use ’em all again!”

Hah! Let anybody just try to trump that!

And the beat goes on, the beat goes onnnnnnnnnnnnnn …

dodo

DAMMIT~! I KEEP

Fly Pig, left bigTHINKING

of two people removed in time but equally sacrificed on the Altars of Dogma (which means “defending my investments”). (Not mine, dammit …)

But first, your link for the moment—

Line, blacker copy 2.png

Screen Shot 2019-07-07 at 08.46.37.png

Line, blacker copy 2.png

—and try hard not to actually think for yourself. If you do, your degree and all those bucks invested in educatio (oops) current dogma might just be wasted.

So dig in—go with the flow, build ramparts, plant minefields around your ‘knowledge’ and fight with rearguard fury against any damned twat that asks questions.

Am I bitter, do you think? Oh … wow … such astuteness … you’ll go a long way, not; but please, for your own sake take note and don’t ever never never quote:

TODAY’S BIG SCIENTIFIC FACTS

ARE ALL TOO OFTEN

TOMORROW’S HUGEST GIGGLE.

You may guess that I read Cranks. A lot. You’d be right, too, I do. So remember that you read it here first:

quite often cranks are cranks—

—until ‘science’ catches up.

The Holy Inquisition set a precedent that still dominates and they set it well. God may be dead but His sacred sincerity lives on.

 Contradictions Law.pngIf you think I’m wrong please feel free to refute me. Rip into me, savage me (but never my points, no?) as only a good* little dogmatist can. (Here’s a further help, go look up the words “ad hominem” … I’ll wait.)

To while away the hours here’s a wee number for us, I love it~!

(Just a beat dated now, though …)

selfie

* Knows his works parrot-perfect. Top marks, in fact …

 

SHE SAID IT~!

down eyeface

“I respect enormously, peoples’ beliefs!”

 

Screen Shot 2019-06-26 at 11.42.18.png

That’s what she said … and this is where so many get it wrong—

  • totally wrong
  • infinitely wrong
  • enormously wrong
  • absolutely unarguably wrong
  • and even a wee bit incorrect, too—

but it’s a party line and she’s very happy bleating it. (And she has a right to, no?)

FOR MYSELF

Much of what people bleat is utter crap

ARGUSSo~?

So I don’t respect crap. Tried, can’t.

Sure, they have the right to bleat and spout their BS all over the place; and that is the right I’d fight for if I had to. That is the right I respect—even if I have no respect at all for much of the Crap they spout.

Let us not misuse semantics here.

Let’s not get it wrong … it actually IS important. Sometimes. I think it was Voltaire* said words to the effect that “I care not for your words, Sir—but I’d fight to the death for your Right to say them!”

Amen to that, Bro … and would only that the blasted bigoted (desperate?) religious might do the same. That ain’t gonna happen—never in an eternity of church-days.

 

Death chattering

 

MORON RELIGION

puns intentional.

Actually, rather than bore you I’ll simply post a wee except and the link. Go there but be warned, it triggers an instant WTF? in rational people.

3 gerbils.gif

A Hindu man who ate beef labelled as lamb wants a supermarket giant to pay for his trip so he can go home to cleanse.

Jaswinder Paul, bought a package labelled as lamb roast … then cooked and ate the contents before discovering the meat was beef.

Cows are viewed as sacred in Hinduism, and eating the meat broke his religious vow, he said.

“According to my religion, I have to go back to my country and do sacred things for four to six weeks, and be purified by priests, so I can continue on my religious path. It’s a long process,” he said.

He would also have to fork out for return flights to New Delhi, in India, alongside accommodation and food, he said…

His family had not talked to him since he ate the beef, he said.​

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/111064745/hindu-mans-beef-with-blenheim-supermarket-after-mislabelling

Well now.

As one who would like to cover all bases and is tempted sometimes to subscribe (metaphorically) to all religions … is there any food anywhere that isn’t ‘sacred’ to some bugger or other somewhere at some time?

Sheesh

WHAT I DON’T

LIKE

ABOUT U-TUBE

Screen Shot 2019-03-09 at 08.18.37.pngsometimes is the ‘comments’. It takes no time at all before the thing bursts into flames, I really can’t be bothered.

But occasionally a genuine reflexive twitch on my part results in a genuine query on my part, which doesn’t faze me in the least when the Morlocks emerge with napalm—if I get answers.

SOMETIMES MY QUERY

will be honestly met by someone who although well intentioned is tied by state-of-the-art current thinking. Let’s get an understanding here: facts change but fancy is forever (until the new arrives).

AS YOU MAY KNOW

I haunt cranks. Cranks are the lifeblood of my existence. Without Crankology life would be reduced to a grind of ‘facts’. I need cranks like hogs need mud.

CRANKS OFTEN

say things that ‘science’ (eventually) agrees with.

WE ARE TOLD

that various previously hidden shafts in the Great Pyramid of Egypt (concealed by the ancient builders) align precisely with stars. This notion has entered the lexicon. “But,” I squawk with wild-eyed enthusiasm, “but — but how can we possibly know that?”

I liken it to naval gunnery—moving vessels needs precise alignments, so all possible factors must be served.

And here we have a pyramid with now unconcealed shafts that align to the sky. Wow.

BUT …

if you feed all the currently known relevant data into your computer it smugly tells you that the shaft lines up with the star Alpha Gurgleatis in the year fifteen thousand X-hundred and umpty years BCE.

“But~” I squawk with ignorant bewilderment, “but is that the only star it aligns to? Surely with the rotation of the Earth and the precession of the equinoxes and Gods alone know what else, it sweeps the sky and in so doing aligns with oodles of other stars?”

I shan’t ask why a so-called ‘air shaft’ was blocked off by the builders … or whom they were trying to provide air for; or why an intangible ethereal ‘spirit’ wouldn’t just float through all the blockery and make his own way out. I just accept that I don’t accept that the GP of E was ever a tomb, and for all the reasons provided by my cranks.

AND NOW TO

rejoin my cranks. Don’t wait up.

tenor.gif

 

IN LOVE AGAIN, AM I …

… EASY?

Screen Shot 2019-03-07 at 00.46.57.png

The new grand unrequited passion of my life

BUT FIRST,

can any double-damned panty-waisting modernist … twat … possibly sink any pathetically lower than this?

down there

The film was also accused of “allergy bullying” for a scene in which a group of bunnies attacks a man with blackberries, knowing he is allergic to them, and provoking calls for a boycott.

Ye utter gods!

Anyone not tempted to take arms against such PC mind-controlling drivel may safely be labelled brain dead and dormant. No? Sheesh—an empty rum bottle has more spirit!

WORLDWIDE

we are being conditioned—and none too subtly—not to query, never to ask questions, never to opine, never to stand up and bark when some points-seeking berk makes yet another asinine ‘observation’.

CONTROL A MAN’S MIND

and you control his body. He becomes your extension, an organic robot to do your bidding. (This, in fact, is what religion is all about; mind Control—nothing more, nothing less.)

Try this:  IF—

—if there really were just one all-singing all-dancing unique ‘God’ there would be only one religion. (Any enthusiast care to argue this point? Do so now, lines are now open and operators poised … all donations will go towards a new charity hospital luxury super jet for the religious leader of your choice*.)

Bugger. Digressed again … I do that a lot—

Screen Shot 2019-03-07 at 00.28.23.png

—but it’s given me an idea: I might just censor the Christian Holy Bible and reword it to be Politically Correct and entirely in accordance with modern standards.

After which the Holy Koran is ripe for PC adjustment. At last, God has shown me the way and given me a renewed sense of purpose~!

BOOM BOOM

* After I’ve taken out my legitimate ‘running costs and expenses, of course …