A QUOTE

buitre162.gif

THIS TIME

and make of it what you will. 

And yes, extrapolation is allowed (encouraged, actually).

Before most of the audience had arrived, I was checking the focus on the slides in my PowerPoint presentation prior to giving my talk and I put up on the screen an image which shows the Orion/Pyramids correlation and the Sphinx/Leo correlation at Giza in the epoch of 10,500 BC. Rightly and properly since the Orion correlation is Robert Bauval’s discovery I included a portrait of Robert Bauval in the slide. As soon as Zahi saw Robert’s image he became furiously angry, shouted at me, made insulting and demeaning comments about Robert, and told me that if I dared to mention a single word about Robert in my talk he would walk out and refuse to debate me.

This is a modern ‘scientist’ in frank and open debate? (No, I’m not referring to the gentle Mr Hancock —I mean the nice Mr Hawass.)

I explained that the alternative view of history that I was on stage to represent could not exclude the Orion correlation and therefore could not exclude Robert Bauval. At that, again shouting, Zahi marched out of the debating room. Frantic negotiations then took place off stage between the conference organisers and Zahi. Finally Zahi agreed to return and give his talk and answer questions from the audience, but he refused absolutely to hear or see my talk, or to engage in any debate with me. I therefore gave my talk to the audience without Zahi present (he sat in a room outside the conference hall while I spoke). When I had finished I answered questions from the audience. Then Zahi entered, gave his talk, answered questions from the audience and left.

well now ....png

One of the few members of the audience who had arrived early did manage to record part of the scene of Zahi storming out of the conference room — see here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ziu2ygE_Wc

The whole illustrates the arrogant pignorance of the gentleman who had/has (?) his grip tightly around the neck of power at the actual site itself. Not good—but he would doubtlessly disagree; and I imagine that if I tried to debate the point would flounce petulantly out of the room with petticoats aflurry and spitting spiders in all directions.

 

For Source:  CLICK HERE

 

IT’S A ‘cultural’ thing?

So I (why always me?) must bend over backwards to accommodate such open-minded, well mannered, couth and cultured, scientifically inquisitive little oiks as  this nice man? (Unless I do I shan’t earn my Snowflake badge) (Bugger~!)

No, my apologies to any deserving sensitivities I may ruffle—this guy is often both desperate to be liked and desperate to appear unbiassed. But the mask drops easily to reveal the thug within (desperate thug, I must add). (Is he Islamic, by any chance—and thus entirely open to unchallenged debate?)

IF THE NICE MR HAWASS

represents the ‘scientific’ establishment of Egyptian studies and antiquities I think our world is a sorry place.

Perhaps he learned his objectivity—if not his manners—at the Adolf Hitler School of Fine Arts in Berlin (and is older than he claims).

But he has style—those ‘Indiana Jones’ hats  … ’nuff sed.

Snowflake

For ol’ Zahi, the very antithesis of The Snowflake

* Yes, Little Ollivia … that was indeed sarcasm. Pure, unsubtle, unadulterated, and the quintessentially genuine article.

CAST ASPARAGUS

Trolleras much as you like

 

“Mock on, Mock on, Voltaire, Rousseau;

Mock on, Mock on, ’tis all in vain.

You throw the sand against the wind,

And the wind blows it back again.”

 

—you can never blacken the name of a living saint (now sadly deceased a bit).

REFERRING TO THE

founder of the Foursquare Church/cult/tax dodge of the USA where almost anything goes (and often does)*.

SOME CONTEMPORARY QUOTES

garnered I gather from news outlets of the time and put into this webbie:

CLICK HERE

—which some may find edifying while others grounds for murder (depends on how good a Christian you are, I guess—most rationalists won’t kill for the sake of a few fairy tales).

HERE YOU GO:

After the good lady Prophet ‘disappeared’ on a beach—

Exhaustive searches were conducted by divers who worked themselves to exhaustion with one dying from exposure. A teenage girl drowned when she dove into the water thinking that she saw Sister Aimee in the water.

But wait, read on—

While investigating the alleged kidnapping, several witnesses came forward saying they recognized a couple matching Aimee and Ormiston’s description. It seems the couple was seen visiting hotels and resorts up and down the West Coast.

Naaah … it’s easy to mix people up—

Before a grand jury could be convened, the District Attorney charged Aimee with obstruction of justice and suborning perjury. When the grand jury was convened they heard more testimony from witnesses who saw the couple in Carmel, California and they reviewed testimony from handwriting experts who testified that the handwriting on registration cards from several hotels was Aimee’s.

Blatant lies and blatant forgeries~! No saint would do such a thing, and (sanctified or not) ‘Sister’ Aimee was a saint. So there~!

In the 1930’s Aimee fell in love and eloped with David Hutton, a singer and actor who played a part in one of Aimee’s illustrated sermons. The marriage was considered scandalous because it broke one of the rules that Aimee herself helped set up. A divorced person was not supposed to marry as long as the former spouse was still alive. Harold McPherson was still alive. Many people saw this marriage as a case of do as I say, not as I do on Aimee’s part

buitre16What more can anyone say? Golden Rule invocation:

HE HOO

HAS THE GOLD…

…MAKES THE RULES

SO THERE!

.

“Mr Argus, Sir?” (Bugger … it’s little Virginia.)

“Yes, beloved child?”

“Sir … aren’t you being a wee bit disrespectful?”

“What’s to respect, Kid?”

“Other people’s beliefs, Sir?”

“Some grown-ups believe in Santa too, Kiddo—”

“The people themselves then?”

“I should respect someone who believes in chopping folks heads off in the street for disrespecting their beliefs?”

“Wot? I mean, wot Sir?”

“Same God, different franchises, Kid. What’s to respect?”

Indeed.

It’s hee hoo time again—

.

Hee hoo has the most guns

sets the local beliefs.  QED

.

Bovine-excrement-meter-animation

Foursquare:  take one in with you next time …

ouch* Freedom means never having to make sense.

MORE ON

SCIENCE-BASED   dragons17

FADS.

(And yes, you were intended to read ‘more on’ as moron. Well spotted, you~!)

FIRST, YOUR GIVENS—

  • today’s hard ‘fact’ is often tomorrow’s giggle
  • a fact is a perception
  • science may bury folks prematurely
  • but it never admits that it is wrong

buitre16

NOW, PLEASE

refute me?

No?

Okay then …

we’ll move on and here’s your ‘quote of the day’—

“All our perceived wisdom on healthy diets largely comes from the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, when the main focus was on heart disease and diabetes.

But the world has moved on now and, as we know, the population is ageing rapidly.

“What we discovered in our research is that the diet guidelines formed in those past decades do not cover the whole field. The world is shifting gear and an ageing population is transitioning into old age – but the diet guidelines we hold dear do not apply to older people,” he says.

Another “Oh dear” and from:  CLICK HERE

BUT in the meantime—which means for the duration of the ‘fact’—lots of lovely money is milked made from the gullible by the unsavoury. A form of win/win, actually … now (and totally unrelated, I assure you): have you had your flu shots yet?

bunny

KISMET

THE HYDRA

HydraREACHES EVERYWHERE

By Hydra I don’t mean a formal criminal/mainstream institution, an organised mob of self-serving altruists pursuing their own ends around the globe and down through the generations.  I mean simply the universal human tendency for self-service; self-service most often concealed behind an ‘altruistic’ mask.

Beware the Hydra —>

But don’t fret—it isn’t coming soon to a place near you …

… it’s already here.

SO, WHAT

may we gather about the below item that triggers the Hydra hackles on this old dog’s neck?

FIRST my disclaimer: No 2 pyramid of G.png

I’d never heard of this writer/source before and have no idea of the reliability of facts provided other than

(a) some of them I already know, and

(b) I’m not impressed that he/she seems to have gotten it a wee bit wrong with the attribution of this snap.

BUT—

if you go there and read it through you’ll find that it asks questions I often ask. Small world, ain’t it? The issue is that the Egyptians are making a goodly buck from their antiquities, which—pyramids especially—they claim were created by Egyptians.

I doubt very much that four millennia back there were any ‘Egyptians’; but the issue now is that there are two schools of thought on the date of that Creation—convention had it that the pyramids were created back then by herds of men and lots of whips. But even convention can change and the fashionable ‘consensus’ now is that the herds of men weren’t slaves at all but cheery volunteers and stuff. (Whips optional?)

The unconvention is that the GP of E (the so called Khufu Pyramid, the biggie) was in fact created thousands of years earlier. Brrrr.

Having read/viewed/etc widely on the topic I am very firmly in the latter camp; which still leaves the arguments unresolved: who exactly created the GP of E, when, how, and why? The damned masterpiece was never signed—but if it were, and with paint, the paint could be scientifically dated, no? Such science applied under the most scrupulous of conditions would resolve the issues, no?

No …

First we’d need a sample of signature paint.

And it would have to be unarguably genuine. That ain’t gonna happen. Not while the nice Establishment folks are in control and very very nervous about their milch cow.

I’m getting wordy—but if you are interested why not just toddle along to this reference:  CLICK ME  … and get a vague idea?

As for our cute little Hydra, I’ll explain a bit more later. (Sufficient unto the day…)

 

Cerberus & Hydra

KISMET

I IMAGINE THAT

pcEVERYONE

has his or her favourite ‘news’ sources. One of mine is ‘Russia Today’. It comes across as legit but we all know of course that it’s Russian propaganda. No?

But prop or not, them dam’ Russkies think along the same lines as I

Trump pursues “no own policies” but only executes the decisions made by the “intelligence agencies, the Pentagon, the big arms manufacturers, oil companies, and financial institutions,” the Syrian leader said in an exclusive interview with TeleSUR.

America’s trump card …

“As we have seen in the past few weeks, he changed his rhetoric completely and subjected himself to the terms of the deep American state, or the deep American regime,” Assad added.

He referred to the fact that Trump came to power on a political platform promising a departure from the interventionist policy of the previous US president, Barack Obama, but soon forgot his promises …

To read from source (RT): CLICK HERE 

I think the dam’ Russkies are almost as dismayed by the POTUS’s performance as I would have been had I not disbelieved the wee scamp right from before the start—their dismay shows that they have a good heart but are a wee bit gullible. More the fool them, then.

ARGUS’S 1ST RULE

of electioneering:

promise them anything

and everything.

Yep, that’s it. (And when The Establishment pulls the rug out from under, just keep smiling*).

cerberus-2KISMET

*  More so if ever challenged …

BUGGER …

WON’T SOMEONE PLEASE

tell us the truth? pc

Dumb question.

Easy answer: no.

THE SIMPLE REASON BEING

that in war the first casualty always is truth. (Cliché, but true …)

SO:

whom do we believe—

  • those typically perfidious Russians
  • the nice duly-elected (ergo God) President of the United Sates*?
  • any of the many truth propaganda outlets …

… all claiming (blatantly or subtly) to be good honest reporting? (Other than me, do any such exist?) (And I have my doubts even about him).

NOT GOOD

but wait, believe now and you get a Free Pass to eternity, complete with all the wine, women, men, infants (if Islamic) and song you could want for all eternity. (Actually, believe now and you may just get it even sooner … boom boom~!)

PEOPLE

disgustipated with the ‘truths’ they are fed sometimes set themselves up as alternate dispensers thereof. It’s all very confusing … a bit like poking through all the various brands and franchises of ‘holy’ books looking for the One True God/s. Pays yer money, take ya chances. Brrrr.

FOR EXAMPLE

this new (to me) outlet. Got a wee article titled “Houthi’s Destroy 11 Saudi Warships in 6 Months” which for all I know might even be true. I have no way of proving/disproving, so like any ‘news’ outlet we have to either accept on faith or worry and fret.

But if you go there I think you are intended to accept the shattered ship image as being of a Saudi ship so clobbered. To which I respond with a cynical “Oh. Really?”

TRUTH

is not only the First Casualty, Truth is always grabbed, stripped, raped, and tucked away out of sight.

But Truth will eventually out, despite the best efforts of the nice folks you have duly elected to safely run your life for you—

La Verite.png

Truth escaping from the well

Her mirror, there? It’s the Mirror Of Truth. Let’s hope that YOU never have to look into it, but sadly there is no evading it in the long run.

The gamble that our politicians and beloved Leaders always take is purely one of time …

cerberus-2

* Who already has kept every single one of his campaign promises and so is utterly  blameless, incorruptible; as pure as the driven snow and even more trustworthy than Santa Claus.

“Mr Argus … Sir?”

“Hic? Oh, Little Virginia; please, not now, Sweetie …”

“Sir—you’re looking awfully green after that asterisk; would you like me to get you a barf-bag?”

AMERICA, BRITAIN, EU

AND ALL OTHERS pc

eat your furry little hearts out!

“In the first decade of this century, he did what Kemal Ataturk had done in Turkey in the 1920s. Out of a crumbling empire, he resurrected a national-state and gave it coherence and purpose. He disciplined his country’s plutocrats. He restored its military strength. And he refused, with ever blunter rhetoric, to accept for … a subservient role in an American-run world system drawn up by foreign politicians and business leaders. His voters credit him with having saved his country.”

You can read from source by CLICKING HERE

Trump? Any of the myriad Bushes?

Churchill? John Key? Mugabe? Don’t ask me, get over there and read for yourself.

Only then may you savage my ankles and justifiably call me a dupe … or perhaps, not.

capture12-1.jpg