AN INTERESTING DISCUSSION

concerning religion

… what else?                              tenor

In which an unprincipled person tried desperately to assert that “Might Makes Right” — and that there’s no such thing as ‘private property’.

Coming from a completely different direction I have no option but to totally agree with him.

In fact, in my own words:

You only OWN

that which you

can hold by force

against ALL comers.

AND NOW, IN PERFECT SAFETY

(and unassailable) I feel safe in inviting—nay, in challenging—anyone at all to attempt to refute me.

Yep. YOU have to prove ME wrong, if you can … but here’s the rub: I don’t have to prove a thing. Not in the least … history does that for me.

It’s a universal …

Screen Shot 2018-11-07 at 09.41.05

Ya wanna argue?

Advertisements

SEX CRIME

?

For no reason other than my sense of humour is a bit out of date in today’s world, let’s open with a sample, but first—

WARNING:

THE FOLLOWING CONSTRUES AS

NON-PC, SEXIST, RACIST, ELITIST

AND EVEN (in places): HUMORist

 

can o' worms

down there

“Help, help~!”

“Yes, Miss?”

“Help! I’ve been raped!”

“Oh … er, you don’t loo—   um …  how do you know … brrrr; okay, what makes you think you’ve been raped?”

“Dammit! His cheque bounced!”

And now flash forward to a current affairs news item, from which I quote:

which include sexual penetration of a child under 16 — 

Swine!

How could he?

But wait, it gets better—

He suggested (insert Number 1 from the below list here) should get a slap on the wrist because his sex crimes against two boys lasted “less than six minutes”, there was “no ejaculation” and “no use of any implement”.

Boys?

His?

This must indeed be some kind of rabid sex maniac monster—!

But as in these days of infinite PC and Compassion and Forgiveness and Open Licence we are not allowed to form opinions, so please ignore anything I have ever said or may ever say that could possibly be construed in any way manner shape or form as any form of ‘ist’ or ‘ism’ or opinion. I do not sit in judgement on any person alive, dead, or undecided no matter who they are, what they are, where they are, what they may be and practise in private or otherwise, and/or to whom they do it with or to so long as it is socially acceptable in a world rapidly shedding any values of value.

Oh, yes … your List—(silly me, nearly forgot)

Line, black.png

LIST:

Item Number 1:  “the Vatican’s third most senior catholic”

Line, black.png

And before I forget, your quote—

He suggested the Vatican’s third most senior catholic should get a slap on the wrist because his sex crimes against two boys lasted “less than six minutes”, there was “no ejaculation” and “no use of any implement”.

from: CLICK HERE

Make of it what you will. (Jesus will forgive him though, regardless of who else won’t—sadly for Big J and His Daddy it’s written in their Terms of Reference:  they have to forgive.)

ANYWAY

Time for bed so I’ll leave you with this thought—

—and the whole movie is well worth the effort.

(CLUE:  Birds aside, I looooove the ending!)

adam_et_eve_-_gustave_courtois

“No! God won’t like it … … got any little boys?”

 

THIS STINKS

pc and is every bit—though few will agree with, or even recognise my point—as bad as what it purportedly opposes:

Nazi Grandma,’ 88, Convicted of Holocaust Denial in Germany

Why?

Why would a humanist like moi cast aspersions upon the brain dead morality-deprived wannabe dogooders ani* of Germany?

AT THE RISK

of insulting such few readers as I have—

THINK ABOUT IT

—and if you can’t see any contradictions between ‘Free Speech’ and shutting people up for speaking …

Screen Shot 2017-10-31 at 10.54.25.png

Weeelll, I have this wonderful bridge for sale—only slightly used, in Sydney Harbour. Free for removal, in fact … just stick a few bucks in my Swiss accounts and it’s all yours.

“Mr Argus, Sir?”

“Yes, Little Virginia?”

“Was that sarcasm, Sir?”

“Not this time Cutie. That was bitterness. But don’t fret—just study form, then off you go and vote.”

“… for Freedom, Truth, Justice and Free Speech, Sir?”

“You got it, Kid …”

chimp-bashes-rock-copy

 

finger-pointing-down-animation-gif copy

* It’s the plural of ‘anus’. (For you Americans it translates as ‘assholes’…)

 

TIME TO DRAW

attention to

panacea

POLITICS

again. Everything is politics

MY BLOGS

have a couple of ‘Pages’ attached.

One of them, (in a form anyone can read) is written more or less as child-lit. Kid-lit, call it what you will. I first drafted it before the great J K Rowling hit the shelves so although you may find similarities there’s no plagiarism involved. She made a bundle, I flubbed, but that’s the way of it and I won’t (can’t~!) complain. Dammit …

IN MY ‘TABITHA

tale I encapsulated a lifetime’s observations with a few bits of cynical thought. But the premises are valid and I challenge anyone to dispute them:

Tabby.png

—and for anyone not au fait with the British way of English, Swindleham isn’t pronounced “Swindle Ham”.  It’s actually “Swindle ’em” …

falls off a pale horse

 

PEACE, LOVE, COMPASSION

MERCY AND pc

total surrender

to the sacred

holy infinite Word Of God*

pigs.png

Well. Now we know and it’s official. But doesn’t the Pope and his merry men-in-dresses stress likewise? Hell, even the great unwashed Ayn Rand said much the same … in the meantime, coming out of the east and the south to Europe, here’s a nice Islamic proselytiser—

doomed

—don’t forget to open your heart and hearth to make him welcome. He has four** fecund wives and at your expense all the time in the world to repopulate your desolate lands and salvage your stuttering economy. Coming right now to you, by the shipload …

buitre16

* Acronym ‘WOG‘ … I’ll be using it in future for Islamics, the definitive experts in this field. Any objections?

** Wow. We are only allowed one … but they are special, no?

SENSE AND

THE RELIGIOUS pc

Recently was an article on Islam as the fastest growing ‘religion’ in the world: Growth of Islam Outpacing Lift in Global Population (f0r source you’ll have to visit The Times).

Personally I don’t see Islam as a religion—it as a system ranking alongside Naziism and Soviet Communism for total control of mind and body. Nice if you can get it but not nice if you are got.

And now—

But the increased circulation of the Quran due to the recent Paris attacks and rise of the Islamic State has not always helped people to better understand and respect the faith. If anything, fear and prejudice toward Islam … 

This is one example of the “widespread illiteracy about religion that spans the globe,” said Diane Moore, director of Harvard Divinity School’s Religious Literacy Project to The Huffington Post.

To combat this illiteracy, Moore and five other religion professors from Harvard University, Harvard Divinity School and Wellesley College are kicking off a free, online series on world religions open to the masses.

Read more:  CLICK HERE

I leave such academic ‘open-minded’ stuffs to the ivory towered, for myself I’m dum’ enough to rely on my own resources—

… Moore suggested that religious literacy should include an understanding that religious traditions are “internally diverse,” ever-evolving, and play complex roles in people’s lives …

—and one wonders exactly what ‘religious literacy’ means? Or entails? All good clean fun for those not being burned at the stake or stoned to death or having their heads lopped off for religious ‘crimes’ … but I am especially intrigued by that bit about ‘ever evolving’.

HOW ON EARTH

can God’s Eternal Word possibly be evolving?

If there is ever to be a reliable constant it has to be the WOG*.

Or do God’s ‘Eternal Truths’ apply specifically to time and place; different in each?

IF THERE IS ONE

eternal truth that should be hammered home (okay, presented to the intelligent to take onboard/refuse as they alone see best) it is this:

 

THINK FOR YOURSELF DAMMIT

cerberus-2

KISMET

* WOG being the Word Of God. (What did you think it meant? Are you displaying a closed mind, hmmmmm? Frightened of your Thought Police, are we, Snowflake?)

CREDIT

CARD DECISION

for my transaction?* (Decision being:  do I buy online a wee giftie for The Spouse with my card, or should I perhaps join ‘PayPal’?).

IN THE COURSE

of my researches I then happened across this snippet which I quote—

PayPal’s partner MasterCard ceased taking donations to WikiLeaks in 2010, and PayPal also suspended, and later permanently restricted, payments to the website after the U.S. State Department deemed WikiLeaks activities as illegal. Online supporters and activists retaliated by subjecting PayPal and MasterCard, along with other companies, to coordinated cyber attacks.[123]

—which of course led me to that “Eeeeeek~!” reaction I get whenever I spot a blatant  and quite unabashed contradiction.

DON’T FRET

if you are a product of your upbringing (circumstances & endless propaganda) and you simply can’t see it.

Too few can, I’m afraid, so you aren’t alone there. Just keep on buying them Lotto tickets and guzzling your beloved Soma …

baaabs

* In the end I opted to use my card. You know something? I’ve often wondered: does anyone ever (r) ever read plough through all the endless screeds, sub-screeds, sub-sub-sub (etc etc ad infinitem) of monotonous unrewarding legalistic self-serving BS jargon? You know the stuff I’m referring to—in the end it can all be summarised simply as “We at (insert name here) declare that we are in no way responsible for anything you do or which is done unto you whilst availing yourself of our services**).

** Which means simply “Just pour your money into our coffers (and Devil Take The Hindmost) (meaning YOU, Bub~!).  Nyah nyah nah nah naaaaaahhhhhh~!