AHA~!

fiddleYOU DON’T FOOL ME~!!

Not a bit, Mr Trump, you and the Asian guy with that other funny haircut*—

Kim.png

I know what you’re up to …

BUT FIRST

WE REALLY SHOULD READ THIS

finger-pointing-down

CLICK HERE

—which as a Conspiracy Theorist (First Class, Dip Hons and stuff) myself my deviously deranged mind makes links and connections not open to mere mortals—

TO CUT TO THE CHASE

and a conclusion entirely obvious:

(a) the world is heating up, no?

(b) Trump and Wossisphace are diplomatically yelling abuse,

(c) and making untenable threats

(d) which sooner or later

(e) will lead to

(f) put up, or shut up

(g) and neither can will back down.

NUCLEAR ‘WARNING SHOTS’ smiley-boom

would become nuclear exchanges in the wink of an eye (first to take his eye off the ball loses)(big time). So, too, does the other guy but as winner he gets to feel good about it. Briefly.

NUCLEAR WARS

we are told quickly become life-changing events. Climate changing, even—and  following very quickly on the tails of a nuclear war is a ‘nuclear winter’. So?

SO COME ON

wake up and small the sulphur—

the nuclear winter cancels out the global warming

boom boom!

I knew it, I’m a genius!

Not only that but it clears away the nasty little oik with the funny haircut too. Brilliant! Okaaaaaayyyy … there may be a few collateral damages but you can’t make an egg without cracking an omelette, right?

WHY ELSE

would the nice Mr Trump be allowed to rave on in public the way he’s reported?

COULD IT BE

that in fact he is merely a simple puppet, on strings being pulled by (shock, gasp, horror) shadowy figures behind the scenes? You know, the unelected permanent governments? The guys who when the SHTF will take refuge in purpose-built hidden bunkers tucked away somewhere safe?

Don’t ask me—I’m just the local Conspiracy Nutter.

As a voter you should be doing your own sums—

hugless-in-seattle

—from somewhere with a good view, preferably. Make the most of it …

 

devil-1

 

*   Is their unusual coiffure some kind of private badge of sub tabula brotherhood?

AS

PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED

in these despatches …

 

Stat 14, CT

now explained: could some folks have had more knowledge than others? By viewing that ‘Station’ above, are we eavesdropping on a private conversation? 

A wee bit, perhaps …

finger-pointing-down

 

1.png

 

… make of it what we you may.

Kismet

I SAID …

I’D POST A PICTURE

 

of a unique image of Station 14 of The Stations of The Cross if ever I could find it (my computer has haphazard files—many lots of) again.

BUT FIRST

here’s some refreshers (Come in, number 14, your time is up).

FOURTEENTH_STATION_Jesus_is_laid_in_the_tomb.jpg

Above, one of many interpretations.

Below, an example of pubic spirited citizenry serving mammo their fellow man men beings—

.

Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 07.59.48.png

Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 08.00.21.png

.

But if you really want to impress your holy friends, you need one of these—

Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 08.03.18.png

—which the CT in me immediately screams of the similarities ‘twixt this beast and Masonic chapels lodges. (The ‘detail’ pic below should blow up larger for you, if desired.)

Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 08.04.30.png

But here now is  the image in question—

Stat 14, CT.png

—and despite the obvious lack of halos and things … it raises a few questions.

Now I have to rabbit through my books looking for the source. After brekkie …cerberus-2

“Mr Argus, Sir~!”

“Eek! … Yes, little Ollivia?”

“Sir—you’re a darned cynic!”

“… … … you are too, kid~”

“It takes one to be one, Sir!”

THE OLD ORDER CHANGETH

pcyielding place to new …

It sure does, Bub—

—and coming soon to your country near you. Enjoy~! (Just 5 and a bit minutes.)

AND ALWAYS REMEMBER

that

YOU

voted for them.

“But,” I hear you squawk, “but I did the very best I could with what I’ve got!”

Fair enough too, so your conscience is clear, no?

Mine isn’t.

I chose the easy way—to post an occasional slightly critical obscure unnoticed little blog with wee saccharine updates now and then. A bit (okay, a lot) like those academics in England writing about the first blasted cuckoos of springtime when Hitler was rampaging across Europe—

“Mr Argus, Sir?”

“Yes, little Virginia?

“Sir—you’re validated Godwin’s Law again.”

“Shush, Child. No-one will ever notice …”

—when I should be storming the doors of Parliament with an electric cattle prod in one hand and a written-in-words-of no-more-than two-syllables definition of Fourth Generation Warfare in the other.

AND TO CLOSE

if you got this far without watching the less than six minutes video above, here it is again, only this time invest those few blasted minutes dammit—

—or not. But whatever happens to you, your families, downlines, children, shopping malls, pork roasts, pet dogs, tax dollars in future—

DON’T BLAME ME

—and if you are kept awake by the sound of hundreds of thousands of dead soldiers spinning in their graves … what the hell, don’t fret—they’re all ancient history.

cerberus-2

A QUOTE

buitre162.gif

THIS TIME

and make of it what you will. 

And yes, extrapolation is allowed (encouraged, actually).

Before most of the audience had arrived, I was checking the focus on the slides in my PowerPoint presentation prior to giving my talk and I put up on the screen an image which shows the Orion/Pyramids correlation and the Sphinx/Leo correlation at Giza in the epoch of 10,500 BC. Rightly and properly since the Orion correlation is Robert Bauval’s discovery I included a portrait of Robert Bauval in the slide. As soon as Zahi saw Robert’s image he became furiously angry, shouted at me, made insulting and demeaning comments about Robert, and told me that if I dared to mention a single word about Robert in my talk he would walk out and refuse to debate me.

This is a modern ‘scientist’ in frank and open debate? (No, I’m not referring to the gentle Mr Hancock —I mean the nice Mr Hawass.)

I explained that the alternative view of history that I was on stage to represent could not exclude the Orion correlation and therefore could not exclude Robert Bauval. At that, again shouting, Zahi marched out of the debating room. Frantic negotiations then took place off stage between the conference organisers and Zahi. Finally Zahi agreed to return and give his talk and answer questions from the audience, but he refused absolutely to hear or see my talk, or to engage in any debate with me. I therefore gave my talk to the audience without Zahi present (he sat in a room outside the conference hall while I spoke). When I had finished I answered questions from the audience. Then Zahi entered, gave his talk, answered questions from the audience and left.

well now ....png

One of the few members of the audience who had arrived early did manage to record part of the scene of Zahi storming out of the conference room — see here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ziu2ygE_Wc

The whole illustrates the arrogant pignorance of the gentleman who had/has (?) his grip tightly around the neck of power at the actual site itself. Not good—but he would doubtlessly disagree; and I imagine that if I tried to debate the point would flounce petulantly out of the room with petticoats aflurry and spitting spiders in all directions.

 

For Source:  CLICK HERE

 

IT’S A ‘cultural’ thing?

So I (why always me?) must bend over backwards to accommodate such open-minded, well mannered, couth and cultured, scientifically inquisitive little oiks as  this nice man? (Unless I do I shan’t earn my Snowflake badge) (Bugger~!)

No, my apologies to any deserving sensitivities I may ruffle—this guy is often both desperate to be liked and desperate to appear unbiassed. But the mask drops easily to reveal the thug within (desperate thug, I must add). (Is he Islamic, by any chance—and thus entirely open to unchallenged debate?)

IF THE NICE MR HAWASS

represents the ‘scientific’ establishment of Egyptian studies and antiquities I think our world is a sorry place.

Perhaps he learned his objectivity—if not his manners—at the Adolf Hitler School of Fine Arts in Berlin (and is older than he claims).

But he has style—those ‘Indiana Jones’ hats  … ’nuff sed.

Snowflake

For ol’ Zahi, the very antithesis of The Snowflake

* Yes, Little Ollivia … that was indeed sarcasm. Pure, unsubtle, unadulterated, and the quintessentially genuine article.

4 WORDS

there are expressions in the English language that are brief yet loaded with hidden depths, often chosen as titles for books.

You don’t even have to go there to get goosebumps. I saw a film years ago and can’t remember any part of it other than the title—

TOO LATE THE HERO

 

—which resonates. Me? I’m a watcher—a vulture perched high in the Tree Of Life; too old to care but hanging in to see if any of it will ever make sense* .

There are others that resonate too—

*  Above Us The Waves

*  Ill Met By Moonlight

*  The Colour Of War

—endless. But this below is the most misguided bit of utter dog’s droppings that anyone can blindly spout—

WE SHALL REMEMBER THEM

—to which I can only shake my head in sorrow (I’ve gone beyond anger). It is pure social formula, conditioned by design to become habit. No? Okay—

CLUE 1:

“If this is ten o’clock, it’s time for coffee.”

CLUE 2:

If this is 25th April, it’s ANZAC Day. If this is 7th December, it’s Pearl Harbor Day. If this is the 11th day of the 11th month, it’s Armistice Day (WW1) …

PAVLOV’S DOGS? US?

Why not … we drool on cue, we make obeisance to parroted phrases on cue (brilliant at that).

To not digress, how about:  Truth, Justice, Freedom, and the American Way?

Oh … oops, sorry, did I miss one? Of course:  Liberty~!

So why not remember Liberty?

After all, as much as they brush it under the carpet and try to hush it up—

—today is still Liberty Day!

Yay! Fireworks all round, no?

No … here, have another wee reminder of Liberty—

memorial-stone.jpg

—and ask yourself that most revealing and most evaded ‘why’—

  • why have so few heard of the ‘Liberty’ event, and
  • why was it covered up, and

and of course: so what?  It’s all ancient history now, dead, and the world is for the living … no?

Screen Shot 2017-06-07 at 14.55.33.png

pic:  survivors coming ashore

 

Lib.png

pic:  about to bring the not-survivors ashore …

AND TO CLOSE:

I’m running a ‘best caption competition‘ for the below contemporary shot (my own entry is in italics under it) —

Lib.jpg

“Don’t worry, lil’ Buddy, we’re here** …”

My comment?

Is pictorial—

—for anyone not actually aboard Liberty but proximate at the time. If this is you, please share it; one each (no hogging, mind) —

Raspberry.png

As for my opening para about ‘four-word expressions’, I adore Americanisms and I still love that ever so reassuring, confidence inspiring—

 

.

“WE’VE GOT YOUR BACK~!”

 

 

buitre16

 

buitre16

buitre16

 

buitre16

 

 

 

 

 

DEDICATED WITH THE GREATEST RESPECT

TO THE MEMORY OF THE VICTIMS OF

THE US ADMINISTRATION

AT THAT TIME

 

 

x.png

 

Remember? That’s a cathartic emotion-fest … but actually think for ourselves enough to actually DO something?

buitre16

 

 

 

 

 

 

* I suspect not. (If reincarnation is real I’m putting in a bid for albatross rather than Ancient Mariner.)

** And we have been all along—but the boss wouldn’t let us join in. Sorry ’bout that.

MORON

the theme of pc

SNOWFLAKES

who, let’s face it, are the up-and-coming force. No apologies, Snowflake, you are indeed a Force to be considered. Proud?

IT SEEMS

that the excuse for anti-Free Speech behaviours is your infantile need to rail against whatever currently upsets your little toy box—today’s fad, for example, is ‘prejudice’.

So anyone exhibiting a ‘prejudice’ (as defined by you) is your target—and you crawl out of your stool* to attack anyone you outnumber. It’s good to see that you aren’t prejudiced where females are concerned—equality gets no fairer than this …

HERE VERBATIM

is something I intended to post years ago but I never posted it. I’d be interested if any Snowflake would take me up on it?**

It began with racial prejudice but drifted off topic a bit—

__________________________________________________________________________

RACIAL PREJUDICE

Query: is racial prejudice—

(a)  as good as

(b)  slightly worse than

(c)  better than

—religious prejudice?

—location prejudice?

—age prejudice?

—global warming prejudice?

—fiction prejudice?

The list of available prejudices is possibly longer than the list of people available to indulge them. (Thankfully some folks can accommodate many prejudices).

SOME UNREALISTIC TURKEYS 

when all else fails try to enforce their goodwill at the point of a gun, and by law compel everyone to be ‘prejudice-free’. Should it be done? Perhaps, if that’s what it would take to get Snowfla  people who are newcomers (to morality, justice, and thought) to actually think.

SADLY

It cannot be done, except by force … and force would simply drive prejudices underground where they’d fester. Prejudices can come from within as the result of experiences; they are the lifetime distillations of experiences measured against internal standards—which means, Snowflake, ‘If you see someone doing things YOU consider bad, you become prejudiced against them’***. Or, they can be inculcated by folks out to further their ends at your expense.

Bovine-excrement-meter-animation.gifThe real ‘bad’ here is if/when you suspend your own critical faculties and religiously accept other peoples’ words instead of verifying for yourself. Not good. Invest in one of these, Snowflake (and USE the bugger)—

IT ALL BOILS DOWN IN THE END

to values. Values mean judgement. Judgement means comparisons. But you cannot compare/judge without facts. You could always of course do as your betters command and simply take their word for it: which you do, Snowflake. You wouldn’t be a Snowflake if you were capable of reason, would you? (Oops, 500 words, quite enough for now…)

cerberus-2KISMET

gunnoob.gif* A pun, Snowflake. If too subtle for you, go look it up. If you are a Newbie at thinking … I can wait.

** Courage in numbers, you’ll have to wait for reinforcements, Snowflake.

*** Judge not lest thou be judged, no? Wrong, Snowflake! You must judge, your very survival depends on it. (Suppose you wanted to beat up some tiny objectivist bitch indoctrinating a class full  of victims with ‘Free Speech’ rubbish, and found that she outnumbered you, hmmm?)