I OBJECT~!baaabs

First quote—

“Another week, another spate of barmy campus bans and ‘safe space’ shenanigans by a new breed of hyper–sensitive censorious youth. At Oxford University, law students are now officially notified when the content of a lecture might upset them …  It all seems beyond parody.”

to read from source:   CLICK HERE**


why? Simple: the upcoming generation is being programmed.

Programmed, not educated. I believe it was Lenin who coined and initiated ‘Political Correctness’ (and he was very good at it*).


is Power. Hee Hoo controls information rocks the cradle and controls the world.


is teach the young to think. As in ‘use of reason’. Ain’t gonna happen though. So eventually the few will be the whistles that control the dogs that control the sheep.


conspiracy theorist I see the hand of the Hydra in everything—


coming soon, if not already:  enjoy~!

Health-and-safety mania means the young are denied resilience-building freedoms that past generations enjoyed, such as playing outdoors, climbing trees and walking to school unaided. Modern mollycoddling means that pupils have been prevented from engaging in activities such as leapfrog, marbles and conkers … Last week, a headmistress in Dundee suggested changing the colour of her school’s red uniform because ‘some research indicates that it can increase heart and breathing rates’

You couldn’t make this stuff up and sell it as fiction.

Fiction has to make sense.

And this stuff is becoming law—

Anti-bullying policies are a statutory obligation in schools and children are subjected to an endless stream of anti-bullying assemblies, activities, books, dramas and stories of celebrity victims. This propaganda encourages children to examine all their interactions through the prism of bullying …



“Mr Argus … Sir?”

“Yes, little Virginia?”

“I sense a non-PC remark coming?”

“Not at all, beloved sensitive sweet child. Don’t you fret, just pop along to your safety rug on your safety-zone stool in your insulated Safety Room and don’t you worry your purty lil’ head none …”

Now, where were we? Oh yes—


Education (in New Zealand) seems to be becoming more and more the domain of Women. Wimmin. At the risk of being savaged by shrieking harridans, or worse, their subjects …

is this a universal, or limited only to the west?

Are we beginning to reap what we sow? Horrible thought …


*   Look at what happened to Russia when the unthinking masses took Lenin seriously …

** But be warned, not for the squeamish (and consumption may make you unwell)


pcyielding place to new …

It sure does, Bub—

—and coming soon to your country near you. Enjoy~! (Just 5 and a bit minutes.)




voted for them.

“But,” I hear you squawk, “but I did the very best I could with what I’ve got!”

Fair enough too, so your conscience is clear, no?

Mine isn’t.

I chose the easy way—to post an occasional slightly critical obscure unnoticed little blog with wee saccharine updates now and then. A bit (okay, a lot) like those academics in England writing about the first blasted cuckoos of springtime when Hitler was rampaging across Europe—

“Mr Argus, Sir?”

“Yes, little Virginia?

“Sir—you’re validated Godwin’s Law again.”

“Shush, Child. No-one will ever notice …”

—when I should be storming the doors of Parliament with an electric cattle prod in one hand and a written-in-words-of no-more-than two-syllables definition of Fourth Generation Warfare in the other.


if you got this far without watching the less than six minutes video above, here it is again, only this time invest those few blasted minutes dammit—

—or not. But whatever happens to you, your families, downlines, children, shopping malls, pork roasts, pet dogs, tax dollars in future—


—and if you are kept awake by the sound of hundreds of thousands of dead soldiers spinning in their graves … what the hell, don’t fret—they’re all ancient history.




of a pin? Don’t ask. I’m more interested in “how many Muslims can change British law?” (All they have to do is establish a foothold and then out breed the natives—at the natives’ expense.)


quoted as being from one of the very greats of modern times—

A member of the Islamic Assembly (Majlis) and its ‘Judicial Commission’, Nayereh Akhavan (here’s a photo of her), has said that there can be no ban on child marriages because there are ten year olds who have reached ‘sexual and intellectual puberty’ and because it would ‘contradict sharia’. We know Islam’s prophet consummated his ‘marriage’ with Aisha when she was 9. And of course there is Ayatollah Khomeini ‘s book of sayings: ‘Tahrir al Wasilah’, where he says that a man can even have sex with a baby.

He says: ‘A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable. If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister… It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house, rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven.’

There’s more on sex with animals and placing penises between the thighs of weaning babes if you have the stomach to read on.

The book in English is very inappropriately called Ruhollah Khomeini, Sayings of the Ayatollah Khomeini: Political, Philosophical, Social, & Religious (“The Little Green Book”) [Bantam Books, September 1985, New York/London. ISBN 0553140329] by the moral relativist brigade.

And I leave your response to you, Snowflake. With no children of my own, ergo no investment in the future, I can but watch in fascination before I pass over my share of the torch. Digne lampada tradas … yeah …


D-Day beach. His price is your legacy. A malinvestment?

And yes—it’s YOUR future at risk. Make the most of it. Conquest comes not with blazing glory but like a thief in the night—and they name it 4GW.

The quote in green above? Uplifted from:  CLICK HERE


The quote in red above used to translate from Latin as “Worthily, hand on the torch”. Google Translate makes it even more interesting (in the present context).





Should one really jail a Muslim priest, for behaving like a Catholic priest?

Or is this one tiny step for man, one giant leap for (hu)mankind?

Read on and be enlightened … after which you should wonder why the hell ol’ Argus posted this one*~?

Catholic priest in drag?.png

(the pic is the link, if you want the source)

And this in Wales, where a shopkeeper was threatened by police heavies with gaol for displaying tee-shirts in his window emblazoned with words (to the effect of) “If you don’t like it here, feel free to leave”


up. No Muslim would abuse little girls, despite the carte blanche given by the Holey Koran. Sorry, I just can’t believe it …


contribute to the case I’m considering putting forward for his retrial acquittal? Just empty your wallets into my kennel—all donations gratefully accepted. And I’ll be asking for the circumstances of the Australian Cardinal Pell to be re-examined too: how many times does it have to be said, that ‘holy men are holy‘ (and thus answerable only to God, so there).



* Ol’ Argus posted this one for equality, the Islamist’s Holy Book allows (condones~!) such behaviour. Catholic priests and things should be allowed equal diplomatic immunity…





In the Course

of research


across a lot of (dare I say it?) codswallop (aka utter poop—only more so).

To illustrate, I offer this rather pathetic would-be attempt at humour. (It has to be humour—no genuine viewer could be quite that thick~!) (But judging by the ‘comments’ … quite a few of them actually are. Thats’ moddin edyakashun fore yew!)



Taken from:


(Add a letter ‘y’ at the end of that link-address and then you can use it.)

buitre16You really don’t want to go there: it’s a tad worse than pathetic (believe me, I suffer for my research).

I read somewhere that Admiral Byrd’s expedition to Antarctica soon after WW2 was sent scampering home with its tail between its legs after getting beaten up by Nazi and Space Alien flying saucers (’nuff said). I liked the idea so thought I’d check it out—you know, brainless Conspiracy Theorist and stuff. But ye gods, way out of my league …


blurry stuff with US gobs running around in RN hats I thought I recognised a few snippets from other sites and vids, one of which I’d found interesting but under a heading similar to “Kamikaze” (and referring to some Sons Of Heaven hot-footing to their heaven).


apologise if anyone can show me where I’m wrong?




and quite irrelevant.

Just as well, too …

Or not—view these snaps and you’ll understand why, they’ll show just how far we’ve come since then:


—I don’t recall that they had any places set up on these beaches where the guys could sit down, towel off, have a hot java and change their socks? These were definitely unhealthy working conditions and with no consideration at all for the employees. Not good.

But wait—it gets worse:


this is undeniably racist ridicule of a minority and the inappropriate misappropriation/denigration of Native American culture.

At the very least United Nations should step in, send a very strongly worded letter of censure to the Pentagon and get these troopers severely disciplined. This is NOT the sort of behaviour (by obviously insensitive thugs) to be tolerated. It should be roundly condemned. Let us see no more repetitions.

At the very least official letters of apology should be sent to the victims.


And here, to further illustrate the points—sleeping on a beach is all very well and good in summer … but in June (even fully clothed) should never be tolerated in a free country. This man’s employers should get a visit from the Department Of Health & Safety, and quickly.

And look at the uncaring manner in which those rifles have been negligently downed—there’s a chance of a blocked barrel or sand in the mechanisms, which  could lead to malfunctions (if I have to spell it out—skinned knuckles and improper language).

And look further: nobody involved in any of these photos is wearing ear-protection against acoustic hazards. Totally unacceptable in the workplace, I tell you!


of ‘Health and Safety in the workplace’ issues. No wonder so many troopers went off needlessly sick.


we came in—


—going for a wee jolly trip around the bay at taxpayer expense is all well and good, but once again nobody in this shot seems to be wearing a lifejacket …

However it’s good to see that they are taking Health And Safety seriously wrt head protection—but are there quick-release mechanisms on those hats?  What happens if (God forbid~!) they were to get tossed out by a freak wave or accident? Wouldn’t the weight of their helmets and other accoutrements make swimming a bit difficult?

Is their helmsman fully certified to current standards, and are his tickets up to date? Has anyone checked all relevant documentation before boarding? Are his charts accurate and guaranteed in-date, certified as such? Has he been tested for drugs and alcohol? Did he get a good night’s sleep before coming to work?

Does that craft have a current Warrant Of Fitness, issued by a Government-approved licensing authority?

Some of the passengers are carrying rifles—were they checked before boarding to make sure that none of them are loaded, and all safeties applied?

Again I must mention about the dry socks—it is unhealthy for any employee to sit around all day in wet socks and totally unacceptable for any employer to expect his her their employees to do so.





—or do I have to spell it out?


and I am grateful to the UK’s ‘Daily Mail‘ news outlet for publishing that article and snaps. Excellent artwork on the part of the restorer/colourist.

This post on behalf of the Offices of Public Good …

Web Troll





and who can come up with a viable alternative? (The first to mention Godwin’s Law gets the official raspberry~!)*

Here, have a nice quote from a source that I must admit I was directed to (not usually my taste) …

snip 1.png

—the image above is an active link to source (UK’s Daily Mail).


obvious action will be accused of trying to resurrect Guantanamo Bay, but in Britain. Oops, I meant reconstruct. Replicate. Dammit …


In our Lands Of The Free, would such action be tolerable? Or do we continue to hang ourselves from the nearest and highest rafters by our own testimonials? It’s a bit of a toughie …


if given draconian powers (or the gift of swaying enough voters) (which means the same thing) I’d very swiftly move to—

a.     emphasise that we have absolute Freedom of speech

b.     in all forms of communication …

—simultaneously followed by a do-gooder-&-snowflake-shocking purge of permissibles in any and all forms of communication such that:

c.     any exhortation to the use of

d.     any force or violence

e.     not specifically authorised by The Law**, or

f.    not demonstrably in spontaneous self-defence …

be banned outright, with severe penalties for anyone ‘inciting’ unlawful violence. As such I’m very happy to announce that the Islamics within our nation must either cleanse their sick literatures and behaviours to conform to civilised (our) standards—or buzz off back to the Islamic paradises they migrated from.


they’d have to meet our standards in all respects. No such thing as religious exemptions from ‘common’ law … or, of course, the rest of us may also go around ‘marrying’ six-year-old little girls and ‘lawfully’ copulating with nine-year-olds; sawing/chopping the heads off disbelievers and generally being a bit inventive in forcing compliance.


in the image above should realise, surely, that us Snowflakes will never allow anyone to slide us into Naziism ‘by the back door’~! Not even for our own good … concentration camps? (Brrrr … but for Islamics at least, the idea has a certain piquancy) (you’re allowed to advocate such when you’d talking theory).


should be equally stuffed up the gander, right? So why single out the sickness that is Islam’s unique true word of God—why pick on just the big guy? Why not purge all such literatures in any so-called ‘religious’ treatises? As a start I offer that all literature pertaining to the Abrahamics be so cleansed.


civilised (I use it to mean possessing Free Speech and secular Justice based on unhung juries of oafs off the street) nations adopt the methods employed by Islam—if no ‘infidels’ be allowed into Mecca, declare the whole of the west (Britain at least) to be similarly sacred.

Boot out/forbid anyone not of my persuasions. The Meccanese (Meccanix?) could never object—they, after all, set the precedents; so they’d continue selling us their oil and we’d keep selling them modern weaponry with which to spread their systems of Love, Truth, Peace, Compassion, Charity and Mercy: win/win.


I’m a genius, the world’s problems solved and before my second coffee too.

So: what do YOU say—




* Pretty bloody obvious, though, ain’t it?

** By OUR law, you silly little invading immigrant ‘refugee’, you …