HERE’S THAT

MAN AGAIN~!

Screen Shot 2018-02-10 at 19.12.32

“Qui? Moi?” *

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/what-did-jesus-look-like-probably-not-what-you-think/ar-BBJGTwL?ocid=ob-fb-enus-580

Boom boom! (Mel—does He fit your notions?)

 

Big G, bigger

(“Argie—that’s a pretty damn’ good likeness, actually!”)

Oh …

 

Screen Shot 2018-02-10 at 17.48.17

*   “Non … Moi!

 

 

Dodo

Bugger … wrong again … mutter mutter mutter …

 

BOOM BOOM! copy

 

3 thoughts on “HERE’S THAT

  1. Okaaaaaayyy … someone has to say it:

    will they be calling a conclave, discussing, voting, and then possibly revamping tens of millions of ‘holy’ images? Will Bibles and prayer books going back generations have to be re-illustrated?

    Oh Goooooooood, this theology is complicated stuff …

    Like

  2. Well, in my view first than worrying about how Jesus looked like, should be first to worry about the proof his Historical existence.
    There’s still so much controversy about it. 🙂

    Like

    1. My view is that if he ever existed at all … that is what he would have looked like. More a Semite than a blue-eyed Nordic … and I don’t believe that he ever existed. At all.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s