THIS SHOULD

BUT WON’T

go viral…

… possibly because of the un-catchy headline (and imagery) on the title page. It’s only ten minutes out of your life, but worth the expenditure.

With thanks to:  

https://theunveiledfeminist.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/ramadan-death-toll-2017/

.

cerberus-2

 

Advertisements

CONVERT TO ISLAM

ya dum’ bugger!

Before it’s too late.

Actually, it may already be too late ….

Victoria Police charge Cardinal George Pell

Posted Thu at 12:41pm

Thu 29 Jun 2017, 12:41pm

Cardinal George Pell is charged with multiple counts of historical child sexual assault offences.

Source: ABC News | Duration: 2min 43sec

For source of the above: CLICKETH HERETH

—although it may yet be too early to judge not; and most likely too late to get him off the hook. Troller

Had he converted earlier, he’d have lost his rank and status (and paltry ‘widow’s mites’) but in Islam one is allowed (encouraged by holy law) to abuse little girls.

It’s all legal, so make the swap right now and go get ’em, your Cardinalship!

“Mr Argus, Sir—”

“Yes, little Ollivia?”

“Is a cardinal what they are speaking of when they refer to a Prince of the Church?”

“I don’t know, little girl—”

“So perhaps little girls should ‘put not their trust in princes‘?’

.

1

Damn! As a Prince Of Peace I resemble that remark!

 

SOME THINGS SHOULD

buitre162NOT

BE FIDDLED WITH …

… lest they rise up and bite thee on the bot. Butt. Arse—

Professor Michael Hiscox, the former Harvard academic who oversaw the trial, said he was shocked by the results and has urged caution.

“We anticipated this would have a positive impact on diversity — making it more likely that female candidates and those from ethnic minorities are selected for the shortlist,” he said.

“We found the opposite, that de-identifying candidates reduced the likelihood of women being selected for the shortlist.”

Oh dear.

Furthermore, bugger. (Poop, too.)

IN MY OWN IDEAL

world an employer—any employer, all employers—are (okay, should be) entirely free to pick and choose for themselves.

Except where taxpayer monies are funding the operations, in which case let the taxpayer choose, no? (If this means you, wee idealist—please suggest the mechanisms?)

ALL DEVOLVES 

to money.

Everything is money. (Any takers this time?) Even guns boil down to money, although admittedly hee hoo—

—hee hoo has the most biggest guns sets the pace (most often governments) … but some bugger has to pay for them.

And if you have money, you can buy guns. Heck, enough money and you can buy governments.

THE NEXT BEST THINGimages

lies in bending the ‘minds’ of the masses in your direction. Hence instead of education we have many thousands of people imbibing Snowflakery; these people who cannot see (and act on) contradictions are welcome fodder for the vote buyers and future controllers: people ‘entitled’ to their free ride.

THE METHOD?

(a) find or create a grievance, and then

(b) milk it for all you can get.

But sometimes even the nicest of well-intentioned highly educated idiots can be a bit surprised—

Men continue to outnumber women at senior ranks of the public service, despite vastly outnumbering men at the rank-and-file level.

to read more:   CLICK HERE 

 

cerberus-2

(Yes, I found that last a bit confusing too … but I have an excuse; just a dum dog …)

A QUOTE

buitre162.gif

THIS TIME

and make of it what you will. 

And yes, extrapolation is allowed (encouraged, actually).

Before most of the audience had arrived, I was checking the focus on the slides in my PowerPoint presentation prior to giving my talk and I put up on the screen an image which shows the Orion/Pyramids correlation and the Sphinx/Leo correlation at Giza in the epoch of 10,500 BC. Rightly and properly since the Orion correlation is Robert Bauval’s discovery I included a portrait of Robert Bauval in the slide. As soon as Zahi saw Robert’s image he became furiously angry, shouted at me, made insulting and demeaning comments about Robert, and told me that if I dared to mention a single word about Robert in my talk he would walk out and refuse to debate me.

This is a modern ‘scientist’ in frank and open debate? (No, I’m not referring to the gentle Mr Hancock —I mean the nice Mr Hawass.)

I explained that the alternative view of history that I was on stage to represent could not exclude the Orion correlation and therefore could not exclude Robert Bauval. At that, again shouting, Zahi marched out of the debating room. Frantic negotiations then took place off stage between the conference organisers and Zahi. Finally Zahi agreed to return and give his talk and answer questions from the audience, but he refused absolutely to hear or see my talk, or to engage in any debate with me. I therefore gave my talk to the audience without Zahi present (he sat in a room outside the conference hall while I spoke). When I had finished I answered questions from the audience. Then Zahi entered, gave his talk, answered questions from the audience and left.

well now ....png

One of the few members of the audience who had arrived early did manage to record part of the scene of Zahi storming out of the conference room — see here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ziu2ygE_Wc

The whole illustrates the arrogant pignorance of the gentleman who had/has (?) his grip tightly around the neck of power at the actual site itself. Not good—but he would doubtlessly disagree; and I imagine that if I tried to debate the point would flounce petulantly out of the room with petticoats aflurry and spitting spiders in all directions.

 

For Source:  CLICK HERE

 

IT’S A ‘cultural’ thing?

So I (why always me?) must bend over backwards to accommodate such open-minded, well mannered, couth and cultured, scientifically inquisitive little oiks as  this nice man? (Unless I do I shan’t earn my Snowflake badge) (Bugger~!)

No, my apologies to any deserving sensitivities I may ruffle—this guy is often both desperate to be liked and desperate to appear unbiassed. But the mask drops easily to reveal the thug within (desperate thug, I must add). (Is he Islamic, by any chance—and thus entirely open to unchallenged debate?)

IF THE NICE MR HAWASS

represents the ‘scientific’ establishment of Egyptian studies and antiquities I think our world is a sorry place.

Perhaps he learned his objectivity—if not his manners—at the Adolf Hitler School of Fine Arts in Berlin (and is older than he claims).

But he has style—those ‘Indiana Jones’ hats  … ’nuff sed.

Snowflake

For ol’ Zahi, the very antithesis of The Snowflake

* Yes, Little Ollivia … that was indeed sarcasm. Pure, unsubtle, unadulterated, and the quintessentially genuine article.

PERHAPS …

I WAS RIGHT finger-pointing-down-animation-gif

when in earlier posts I murmured that the wildly enthusiastic Dr Zahi Hawass was being too emphatic (and a bit presumptuous) when he kept/keeps identifying with the ‘ancient Egyptians’?

(CNN)Ancient Egyptians and their modern counterparts share less in common than you might think. That is, at least genetically, a team of scientists have found.

Researchers from the University of Tuebingen and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, both in Germany, have decoded the genome of ancient Egyptians for the first time, with unexpected results

Publishing its findings in Nature Communications, the study concluded that preserved remains found in Abusir-el Meleq, Middle Egypt, were closest genetic relatives of Neolithic and Bronze Age populations from the Near East, Anatolia and Eastern Mediterranean Europeans.

Modern Egyptians, by comparison, share much more DNA with sub-Saharan populations.

The findings have turned years of theory on its head, causing Egyptologists to re-evaluate the region’s history while unlocking new tools for scientists working in the field …

SOURCE:  CLICK HERE 

 

I SAY AGAIN    buitre162.gif

that although Hawass calls the people who built the pyramids (and other such stuff) ‘Egyptians’ he may be desperately cashing in on someone else’s legacy (and glory)~?

LET’S FACE IT

simply living there doesn’t make you one of ‘them’. Never did, never shall—even if you do hold the passport. (How many American citizens were rounded up and popped into concentration camps in WW2—for having Japanese ancestry?)

I HAVE FORGOTTEN

a lot of stuff about the ancient Middle East but in the course of quite extensive readings have become a ‘Pyramid nutter’. If you have even the slightest inclination you might be stirred by reading about the GP of Giza, the Serapeum, the temple of Abydos, the uncompleted obelisk and many other such. Let’s leave those fanciful ‘space aliens’ out of it, and ask “How?” rather than just accepting that they are there. (Ask ‘who’ and ‘when’ while you’re at it.)

Or, if you listen to professionals like Hawass (and any others who’ve put in the time and distance to earn the degrees) you might like to carry one of these with you—

Bovine-excrement-meter-animation

—and keep it handy at all times. History, it is said, it written by the victors … and the victor is the guy in possession of the field.

Holding turf doesn’t necessarily make you right …

cerberus-2

In the Course

of research

I HAPPEN

across a lot of (dare I say it?) codswallop (aka utter poop—only more so).

To illustrate, I offer this rather pathetic would-be attempt at humour. (It has to be humour—no genuine viewer could be quite that thick~!) (But judging by the ‘comments’ … quite a few of them actually are. Thats’ moddin edyakashun fore yew!)

 

oink.png

Taken from:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qahszI3fdZ

(Add a letter ‘y’ at the end of that link-address and then you can use it.)

buitre16You really don’t want to go there: it’s a tad worse than pathetic (believe me, I suffer for my research).

I read somewhere that Admiral Byrd’s expedition to Antarctica soon after WW2 was sent scampering home with its tail between its legs after getting beaten up by Nazi and Space Alien flying saucers (’nuff said). I liked the idea so thought I’d check it out—you know, brainless Conspiracy Theorist and stuff. But ye gods, way out of my league …

IN ALL THAT

blurry stuff with US gobs running around in RN hats I thought I recognised a few snippets from other sites and vids, one of which I’d found interesting but under a heading similar to “Kamikaze” (and referring to some Sons Of Heaven hot-footing to their heaven).

I’M MORE THAN WILLING TO

apologise if anyone can show me where I’m wrong?

cerberus-2

JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT

IT WAS SAFE TO WORSHIP

AGAIN—

1.png

—some rotten bugger slips you a crippler and upsets your equilibrium.

Before you read on, look at the image above (have a quick worship if you like—I’ll wait) … then here’s another shot of the same god, a divinity of many faces. I guess wysiwyg~?

2.png

Okaaaaay … he’s a little different from the above image, but still in the ball-park.

We’ll keep him.

BUT, BUT, BUT

I can hear the ‘protesteth-too-much’ folks “Ya not meant to take it literally! They had no cameras in them days etc etc ad etc …”

Perhaps I should allow a little leeway—some slack for artistic licence, for a God made in Man’s image?

AND NOW

for the definitive true-to-life Jesus—

4.png

—take your pick.

But wait, choose now and we’ll throw in a free link to Google, where you can choose from many hundreds to find your very own personal exact likeness of someone who actually never existed.

3.pngHeck, here’s another pin-up for reading this far—it’s one especially for the Celtics among us.

So He was a scruffy redhead as well as blond and dark—all things to all men (you can’t ask better of the Guy created the entire universe from diddley-squat).

BUT NOW

to stop teasing and put you out of your misery: science has come to the aid of theology. Working as a sort of a team they’ve come up with an answer to that most important of questions:

What did Jesus really look like? 

It appears that God looks like this guy, below. A bit disappointing really, I prefer the blue-eyed aryan type myself but that’s God for you, full of surprises—

Big J.png

see below for a simple comparison image

For the definitive combo look to the pic on left below. (The pic on the right was a tougher call:

 

   spins-down.gif

 

6.png

AND THIS IS WHERE

I must leave it for now.  Maybe it might turn out one day that, actually—

—He looked like this!  

cerberus-2

“Mr Argus, Sir?”

“Yes, Little Ollivia?”

“Sir—does having a piccie of Jesus not violate the second Commandment?”

“Oink?”

“An image of God isn’t strictly kosher, Sir—?”

x.png

“I think it’s legal, Kiddo, if they love it but don’t worship it.”

“Oh … but what is number two, Sir? I’ve trolled the web—”

“I think you mean ‘trawled’, Cutie?”

“—oops; but everywhere I get different Numbers two. Number twos—”

“Let’s leave it as Number Twos, kiddo. Don’t sweat, religion is full of ’em.”

 

buitre16