AND SO IT

Flag_of_the_NSDAP_(1920–1945).svgBEGINS

and who can come up with a viable alternative? (The first to mention Godwin’s Law gets the official raspberry~!)*

Here, have a nice quote from a source that I must admit I was directed to (not usually my taste) …

snip 1.png

—the image above is an active link to source (UK’s Daily Mail).

ANYONE SUGGESTING SUCH

obvious action will be accused of trying to resurrect Guantanamo Bay, but in Britain. Oops, I meant reconstruct. Replicate. Dammit …

QUERY

In our Lands Of The Free, would such action be tolerable? Or do we continue to hang ourselves from the nearest and highest rafters by our own testimonials? It’s a bit of a toughie …

FOR MYSELF pc

if given draconian powers (or the gift of swaying enough voters) (which means the same thing) I’d very swiftly move to—

a.     emphasise that we have absolute Freedom of speech

b.     in all forms of communication …

—simultaneously followed by a do-gooder-&-snowflake-shocking purge of permissibles in any and all forms of communication such that:

c.     any exhortation to the use of

d.     any force or violence

e.     not specifically authorised by The Law**, or

f.    not demonstrably in spontaneous self-defence …

be banned outright, with severe penalties for anyone ‘inciting’ unlawful violence. As such I’m very happy to announce that the Islamics within our nation must either cleanse their sick literatures and behaviours to conform to civilised (our) standards—or buzz off back to the Islamic paradises they migrated from.

IN FACT

they’d have to meet our standards in all respects. No such thing as religious exemptions from ‘common’ law … or, of course, the rest of us may also go around ‘marrying’ six-year-old little girls and ‘lawfully’ copulating with nine-year-olds; sawing/chopping the heads off disbelievers and generally being a bit inventive in forcing compliance.

THE NICE POLICEMAN

in the image above should realise, surely, that us Snowflakes will never allow anyone to slide us into Naziism ‘by the back door’~! Not even for our own good … concentration camps? (Brrrr … but for Islamics at least, the idea has a certain piquancy) (you’re allowed to advocate such when you’d talking theory).

SAUCE FOR THE GOOSE

should be equally stuffed up the gander, right? So why single out the sickness that is Islam’s unique true word of God—why pick on just the big guy? Why not purge all such literatures in any so-called ‘religious’ treatises? As a start I offer that all literature pertaining to the Abrahamics be so cleansed.

OR—

civilised (I use it to mean possessing Free Speech and secular Justice based on unhung juries of oafs off the street) nations adopt the methods employed by Islam—if no ‘infidels’ be allowed into Mecca, declare the whole of the west (Britain at least) to be similarly sacred.

Boot out/forbid anyone not of my persuasions. The Meccanese (Meccanix?) could never object—they, after all, set the precedents; so they’d continue selling us their oil and we’d keep selling them modern weaponry with which to spread their systems of Love, Truth, Peace, Compassion, Charity and Mercy: win/win.

OH GOD

I’m a genius, the world’s problems solved and before my second coffee too.

So: what do YOU say—

snowflake

?

screen-shot-2016-10-04-at-00-15-05

* Pretty bloody obvious, though, ain’t it?

** By OUR law, you silly little invading immigrant ‘refugee’, you …

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “AND SO IT

  1. I am not sure I would subtract from literature any hurt or harm or there would be a real lack of good books and movies. I do think that inciting or acting on that incitement to a violent act is punishable regardless of faith or position or title. The only exception to that inciting violence law would be the military. Yes I am in favor of both peace and having a military. I think that for far too long religions, all of them, have been have been given a pass from normal citizenship and responsibilities. They should be held, both as a organization and individual members, to the same responsibilities and duties as the majority of citizens are held too. I do not believe any faith or religion should have power or sway over a secular government or laws. So no trying to enforce your faith and yes live by secular laws. I think we agree on this, correct? Hugs

    Liked by 1 person

  2. The Romans had a very precise word for it—

    SI VIS PACEM PARABELLUM

    —and who in his right mind could or would argue with such?
    Yes, there should indeed be one law for all, applicable to all, with no exemptions. (Don’t fret, the Islamics are actively working on this …)

    Frankly, I would much rather it be a Law based on objective principles, but we’ll find as always that “might is right”. Might makes ‘right’, sadly. Hee hoo holds the gun makes the rules.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s