and who can come up with a viable alternative? (The first to mention Godwin’s Law gets the official raspberry~!)*
Here, have a nice quote from a source that I must admit I was directed to (not usually my taste) …
—the image above is an active link to source (UK’s Daily Mail).
ANYONE SUGGESTING SUCH
obvious action will be accused of trying to resurrect Guantanamo Bay, but in Britain. Oops, I meant reconstruct. Replicate. Dammit …
In our Lands Of The Free, would such action be tolerable? Or do we continue to hang ourselves from the nearest and highest rafters by our own testimonials? It’s a bit of a toughie …
if given draconian powers (or the gift of swaying enough voters) (which means the same thing) I’d very swiftly move to—
a. emphasise that we have absolute Freedom of speech
b. in all forms of communication …
—simultaneously followed by a do-gooder-&-snowflake-shocking purge of permissibles in any and all forms of communication such that:
c. any exhortation to the use of
d. any force or violence
e. not specifically authorised by The Law**, or
f. not demonstrably in spontaneous self-defence …
be banned outright, with severe penalties for anyone ‘inciting’ unlawful violence. As such I’m very happy to announce that the Islamics within our nation must either cleanse their sick literatures and behaviours to conform to civilised (our) standards—or buzz off back to the Islamic paradises they migrated from.
they’d have to meet our standards in all respects. No such thing as religious exemptions from ‘common’ law … or, of course, the rest of us may also go around ‘marrying’ six-year-old little girls and ‘lawfully’ copulating with nine-year-olds; sawing/chopping the heads off disbelievers and generally being a bit inventive in forcing compliance.
THE NICE POLICEMAN
in the image above should realise, surely, that us Snowflakes will never allow anyone to slide us into Naziism ‘by the back door’~! Not even for our own good … concentration camps? (Brrrr … but for Islamics at least, the idea has a certain piquancy) (you’re allowed to advocate such when you’d talking theory).
SAUCE FOR THE GOOSE
should be equally stuffed up the gander, right? So why single out the sickness that is Islam’s unique true word of God—why pick on just the big guy? Why not purge all such literatures in any so-called ‘religious’ treatises? As a start I offer that all literature pertaining to the Abrahamics be so cleansed.
civilised (I use it to mean possessing Free Speech and secular Justice based on unhung juries of oafs off the street) nations adopt the methods employed by Islam—if no ‘infidels’ be allowed into Mecca, declare the whole of the west (Britain at least) to be similarly sacred.
Boot out/forbid anyone not of my persuasions. The Meccanese (Meccanix?) could never object—they, after all, set the precedents; so they’d continue selling us their oil and we’d keep selling them modern weaponry with which to spread their systems of Love, Truth, Peace, Compassion, Charity and Mercy: win/win.
I’m a genius, the world’s problems solved and before my second coffee too.
So: what do YOU say—
* Pretty bloody obvious, though, ain’t it?
** By OUR law, you silly little invading immigrant ‘refugee’, you …