George, half a year ago, said this

The EU has “ceased to satisfy its citizens’ needs and aspirations,” George Soros said calling on people to “band together to save it.” The billionaire warned the disintegration of the bloc will be almost impossible to avoid.

“Britain eventually may or may not be relatively better off than other countries by leaving the EU, but its economy and people stand to suffer significantly in the short to medium term,” Soros wrote in a commentary on the website Project Syndicate.

“The catastrophic scenario that many feared has materialized, making the disintegration of the EU practically irreversible.”

—which provokes me in turn to ask:

cui bono?

Meaning ‘who benefits’?

And let’s face it, another gathering of many diverse taxpayers into one huge heap achieves nothing more than simplifying the task of tax collecting. No?

More taxes collected means bigger and better bribes for the voters—but at whose expense? (CLUE: never at the parasitical politicians’ expense.)

More taxes means more and more pointless layers of bureaucracy working hard at justifying themselves—somehow —with more and endless more pointless rules and regulations. Not good.


trade. Skills and products are marketed.

The freer the market (meaning: the less the impositions, the fewer the pointless regulations, the fewer the needless ‘licences’ and permits and compliances) the better the flow of trade. Better flow of trade means greater prosperity for all concerned (once the regulators have been fired and forced to get real jobs*).


a United States of Europe. Or a United Nations of Europe. All that Europe needs is a Free Market—

  • free of bureaucracy
  • free of needless politicians
  • free of pointless stupidities, hence free of waste
  • free to get on with producing and trading



a case of ‘produce and trade, or die’. Someone should point out to ol’ George that the worst thing the peoples of Europe could do would be to “band together to save it”.  Their efforts would be infinitely better spent banding together to destroy it.

Once we realise that imperfect understanding is the human condition there is no shame in being wrong, only in failing to correct our mistakes. 

The so-calledEuropean Union was (is) a big mistake.

Laughable if not so tragic—all those millions of people desperately voting for some crumbs from someone else’s table, for a share of someone else’s rewards, for benefits from someone else’s efforts.Not good.




* Real jobs, producing something someone will buy. No buy means no profit, no profit means no dinner.



in one foul swoop (ref my previous post).

Read on …

German Justice Minister

Heiko Maas has promised to crackdown on the growing problem of multiple, forced, and underage marriages that immigrants from developing countries are bringing with them – but which have often been ignored by authorities.

“No one who comes to us has the right to put their cultural roots or their religious beliefs above our laws,” the politician from the center-left SPD party told Bild newspaper on Tuesday.


out of this problem. They cleverly split their laws such that they apply to Brits only—the imports, it appears, can do what they like with impunity. (Well done, Prime Minister May and your cronies. Good one, you’re off the hook) (and can even now blame the EU.)

“I know a few men with many wives,” Berlin Imam Abdul Adhim Kamouss admitted to Deutsche Welle. “The question is what does Maas want to do? I can understand it if he says that people who live here in Germany, and grew up here, cannot marry more than one woman – that is the law – but what about the people who come here and already have more than one wife? What are you supposed to do with those marriages?”


in one tiny package (given even half the chance) would be for the wannabe immigrant to

Take all your little wives to Saudi Arabia


and everyone is happy.

There you are, little worried immigrant … off you go, then … shoo~!

Toddle off to where you’ll be welcomed with Islamic open arms; and strictly in accordance with the tenets of Islam you’ll be Peaced, Mercied, and compassionately Charitised as much as your needy hearts require—you and all your wives, plus any little Muslims they have churned out for The Islamic Holy Cause.


all round. You get to keep your paedophiliac family ties intact and will be right on site for the next Hadj; the Saudis will further guarantee their own places in Paradise (for compassionately taking you in) and the Brits get some of the egg wiped off of the face of their law. Only some, but it would be a start …


that it must be confusing to anyone having to police the once-were-British laws right now.


in Britain there’s a cute wee birdie that lays its egg in the nests of other cute wee birdies. It’s called the Cuckoo. The cuckoo’s egg hatches into a nasty hairy thing that immediately tosses any other eggs out of the nest—often whilst the mother host vacantly watches with a benign birdy smile. So?

So I just thought I’d throw that one in to confuse you, my silly sense of the ironic. Make of it what you will …

Screen Shot 2016-10-30 at 19.00.09.png


—and yes. I do know the difference ‘twixt foul, fell, and fowl.



Try this on for size—

Chapter Three: A Short Digression On The Pig; or, Why Heaven Hates Ham

Hitchens discusses the prohibition on eating pigs (“porcophobia” as Hitchens calls it) in Judaism, also adopted by Islam.[7] Hitchens writes that this proscription is not just Biblical or dietary. He reports that even today, Muslim zealots demand that the Three Little Pigs, Miss Piggy, Piglet from Winnie-the-Pooh and other traditional pets and characters be “removed from the innocent gaze of their children.”[8] Hitchens proposes that the prohibition against pork found in Semitic religions may be based in the proscription of human sacrifice, extended to pigs because of the similarities in appearance and flavor between pork and human flesh.[9]

To read source entry (Wiki): CLICK HERE 

I was watching U-toobs, discovered that one of the Hitchens is deceased. Following it up I happened across the above—for once I feel disinclined to edit or comment. Stet.






month, year, decade … aaaah, stuff it: millennium.

A UN watchdog has slammed Saudi Arabia for subjecting minors as young as 15 to stoning, flogging, amputation, and even execution, contrary to the children rights convention, but a Saudi official reportedly responded that sharia is “above all laws and treaties.”

Note well that final sentence.

Screen Shot 2016-10-30 at 10.15.15.png

Read and feel just a little … tiny … bit … queasy. But wait, it gets better—

The 18-member committee also strongly criticized Saudi Arabia’s traditional practices of punishing perpetrators with stoning, flogging, and limb amputation, demanding that it “repeal all provisions contained in legislation” authorizing such penalties.

Read more:  CLICK HERE

Screen Shot 2016-10-30 at 10.21.04.pngThe referenced article then drags up boring stuff about human rights, the rights of minors, the rights of girls especially their God-sanctioned right to be married off young* yadda yadda yaada. All good stuff, and possibly helps us understand why Russia was bumped from being on the UN Human Rights Council.

To be replaced on said Council by whom?

Yup. By Saudi Arabia—the very paradigm of human rights in this world. Praises be to Allah~!


before you go all judgemental on me, how about popping over to a nice friendly sharia country for a wee holiday?

Screen Shot 2016-10-30 at 10.20.25.pngVacation in the security, the peace and compassion of Sharia, under the umbrella and all pervading rights of The Most Merciful and Most compassionate paradigm of Justice Himself; one Mr Allah Esq and his merry Profit Mo—

—who would never dream of being not-nice to foreigners dumb enough to visit them.

The joke? Oh, yes—if you can’t see it, then I’ll explain it as a wee bit of irony satirically made visible by the adroit and delicate subtle use of blatant sarcasm. No? Otherwise let me spell it out:

Saudi Arabia on the UN Council for Human Rights

—and you don’t get nothin’ no more hilarious than that. It’s priceless!*

In the meantime, you may now beam me up Scottie … there’s no intelligent life down here.cerberus

“Mr Argus, Sir … ?”

“Yes, my rather worried looking Little Virginia?”

“Sir—wouldn’t you think they’d get their act together?”

“Hush child! Someone might hear you …”

* As ‘young’ as age 6 (six~!) years from birth, but mercifully (praises to Him etc etc) randy goat husbands are not allowed to copulate with them until they reach the mature age of nine years. Coming soon to a western nation near you: Sharia Law. Get used to it …



senile erectile dysfunction?


under the heading of:

“What if we told you—”

Screen Shot 2016-10-29 at 21.31.17.png

  • that Islam doesn’t recognise any sovereignty but that of Islam itself?
  • that Islam isn’t a religion, but a borderless state?
  • that a Brit (or any other) passport is simply a convenience?
  • that Islamists respect force and strength, and only force and strength?
  • that any morals not derived from the Holy Koran are mere inconveniences?

Read/view more:  CLICK HERE


I may labour these points. They are important—to me they are important from an academic standpoint; to you they are not merely important, they could be vital. Ignore them at your peril (especially if you have a pretty little girl).

But wait: don’t we have laws protecting our children?

Screen Shot 2016-10-29 at 21.31.55.png

No, I guess not.

It seems our laws are now selective; which means no longer universally applied by ‘blind Justice’. So some people are privileged, others not … here, have a pretty wee kid—

8 yr old dies on her wedding nigh.png

—who didn’t survive her wedding night, according to the computerised voice reading the script. Propaganda? Eight years of age and died from internal injuries inflicted by a wildly enthusiastic ‘husband’. Coming soon to a sharia zone near you, regardless, so get used to it.

Screen Shot 2016-10-29 at 22.07.39.pngBut hubby would be free to marry again, and again, and again, and again (he’s allowed four, you know) and would be welcomed into Britain with all of them—whereas the natives are limited to only the one, of actual marriageable age; so hard luck on any drooling native paedophiles ‘cos they gotta wait quite a bit longer than age eight.

OR MAYBE I am just a prejudiced old fossil showing his age and unable to keep up with modern trends?

As for the nice Theresa May referenced above: who says that you have to let them in? As far as UK’s ‘once-was-law’ is concerned, these nice people simply should not (r) NOT be admitted. Send ’em over to the EU that made those EU laws. Let the EU folks sort ’em out … and if they won’t, they can send them home. (Fingerprint them first, for obvious reasons)*.


* It should be obvious that some of them will get home, pop the young ‘brides’ on the head with a hammer, and come back again unencumbered.

Fingerprints at the border might raise a few embarrassing questions, no?


hate speech?HAS PASSED

and now it’s the Age of Self-preservation.

As a non-violent person I think it’s time we did something to reveal the nice ‘Politically Correct’ people for what they are—folks too desperately toeing the party-line to think for themselves.

Let us somehow be teaching them to think objectively rather than emotively following their ‘PC’ programming. Thinking must be based on hard Reality, not on soft and fluffy dreams.


of much needed fresh air. I don’t know if he’s left, right, or centre—I really don’t give a damn—I just like what he’s saying:



The Netherlands Ours Again! GW.png

Millions of Dutch citizens have simply had enough of the Islamization of our country. Enough of mass immigration and asylum, terror, violence and insecurity.

Here is our plan: instead of financing the entire world and people we don’t want here, we’ll spend the money on ordinary Dutch citizens.

This is what the PVV will do:

1. De-islamize the Netherlands

– Zero asylum seekers and no immigrants anymore from Islamic countries: close the borders

– Withdraw all asylum residence permits which have already been granted for specific periods, close the asylum centers

– No Islamic headscarves in public functions

– Prohibition of other Islamic expressions which violate public order

– Preventive detention of radical Muslims

– Denaturalization and expulsion of criminals with a dual nationality

– Jihadists who went to Syria will not be allow to return to the Netherlands

– Close all mosques and Islamic schools, ban the Koran

2. The Netherlands independent again. Leave the EU

3. Direct democracy: a binding referendum, power to the citizens

4. Completely abolish health care deductibles

5. Lower housing fees

6. Retirement age at 65, indexation of supplementary pensions

7. No public money for development aid, windmills, art, innovation, broadcasting, etc.

8. Rollback cuts in home care and elderly care, more hands on the bed

9. A lot of extra money for defense and police

10. Lower income taxes

11. Halving of car taxes …




For myself on the ‘Refugee’ issue I’d immediately seal the borders. Any more trying to get in would be returned to sender.

Any already in would promptly renounce Islam and convert to (as an atheist, dare I say it?) Christianity, or join their brethren outside. Freedom of religion? By all means … Islam isn’t a religion, it’s a disease of the mind.

We would be called ‘Racist’ though.


Rational .png

So which is better:

  • to be thought a racist in your own home or
  • be treated as a pig by human pigs, in a world you allowed them to remodel?

Your call …





but it does seem to add a hint of authority to content. Sometimes.pc


what we say when blogging is simple common sense (actually, in this sloganistic modern age, uncommon). So here’s my challenge: pick holes in this lot. If you can …

  spins down copy.gif


(oh dear, not another damned ‘we love capitalism’ post?) (No. Read on …)

Values are what we seek to gain, and to keep.


are our western philosophies upon which our western laws are based—you know, that old ‘Freedom Of Speech’ stuff—and the voting in multi-party elections open to all citizens; and equality of gender, and all of us being equal before The Law etc.

We valued such, once*.


with me so far? Oh, good … now: as strange as it may seem there are actually folks out there in the world with values different to yours. How about that!?!

How could anyone not love Free Speech, Veteran’s Day, Spangled Stars, Truth, God and the Queen, Justice, Free Speech, Good wines, and the (whoever) Way?

AND (it gets worse)

they (the outlanders)—just like everyone else want to take over and make their ‘values’ supreme and universal. Their values, their ‘law’—and because their god is bigger and better than yours, their trial by insane bigots is better than your trial by jury etc … they will win. They will take over.

Even more better (for them) is that they genuinely believe in the power of their sword over your pen—

  Cartoon 2.png

—to actualise their beliefs; so they are of course entirely correct. No?

Might makes Right; end of story. For the present in the west the west has the might, which is good for the west because by force of arms it can retain its values. For now.

But this is changing …


… and more on that in a later post. I await your rebuttals: surely my Political inCorrectness cannot go undismissed? Unrebutted? Unsquelched?

Or does your silence mean consent? pigs-will-fly

Here, have a devout wish  spins RH.GIF

… and may you get what you deserve.

(A malediction, but you earned it … however I do feel truly sorry for your children and their descendants.) (Your legacy will be your fault, not mine.)


* It seemed important—remember those rheumy old guys you drag out once or twice a year to dust off make a fuss of? You know, the ones who “I fought and died in the XXXXX** war for you and your Rights, and here you are throwing it all away, you ungrateful pup!”

** Insert War of own choice here. Don’t fret, there’s lots. You’ll get a chance to play too, soon, if you don’t act peacefully now (actually, yesterday).


cerberus(or should it be …)


do we believe?


if it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck, quacks like a duck; it’s a …

… never mind.

They’re all quackers anyway:

A Saudi Arabian princess sparked a tsunami of angry remarks online, after it became known that she had allegedly made a Parisian decorator kiss her feet and told her bodyguards to “maim” and “kill” the worker.

The incident took place this past summer, but only became known to the public this week, after the victim of the alleged royal assault filed an official complaint with the French authorities. 

The man, whose name also remains unknown, claims that he was invited to the princess’s residence in the prestigious 16th district of Paris to do some basic redecorating, Le Point newspaper reported on Tuesday. 

Upon arrival, the man started taking pictures of the room he was assigned to decorate, which is a standard procedure aimed at being able to return the furniture back to where it had been after the work is completed.

The princess, however, allegedly accused the decorator of planning to sell the pictures to the media and lost her temper. According to the victim, two of the royal’s armed bodyguards grabbed him, tied his hands together, hit him in the head and made him kneel and kiss the woman’s toes. 

The decorator also said the princess ordered them to “kill the dog, he does not deserve to live,” referring to the man. The decorator says the ordeal lasted some four hours before a third bodyguard arrived, took a copy of his ID and kicked him out, allegedly telling him never to return to district 16.

… Paris prosecutor has not yet indicated whether the man’s complaint will be investigated.

images-1to read more: CLICK HERE

In the light of my years
I could say that this snippet carries ‘The Ring Of Truth’.



Well now …


“Mr Argus, Sir?”

“Yes, Little Virginia, sweet and wise child?”

“Sir … how do you spell doubleyew tee eff?”




And now, one Nigel Farage in mid stride—

Ol’ Nigel uses the word ‘religion’ in his words to the effect “we want to live together nicely, regardless of race or religion …”

Did you spot the fallacy?

He was specifically-obliquely referencing/addressing Islam. Okaaayyy …

His mistake was using the word ‘religion’ as if it meant religion as we in the west know knew it.

I say again (and am still awaiting rebuttal~)

“Islam is NOT a religion~!”

(But wait, it gets better)—

Islam is a system of absolute 24/7 power: thought control, mind control, politics, diet, dress, company, pets, livestock, association, marriage, slavery etc etc ad nauseam; complete with death* for anyone wanting to break away from it.  Brrrrrrr. 

And now, let’s continue with the day’s laughs …

Screen Shot 2016-10-26 at 15.22.46.png

“I don’t think we should legislate on what people wear …”

—this is as far as I got before I cracked up completely. I had a mental image of some clown with a shotgun attempting to cure his own athletes foot—but I struggled on with it. And yes, it does get better—he babbles on about tolerance and respect for each other (sniff). Hell, I could almost sign up myself …cerberus

… if I could afford the lobotomy.

But the nice Mr Khan wasn’t the only one. This next guy had a black belt in PC babble too (I love watching experts in any discipline, they make it look so easy).

Screen Shot 2016-10-26 at 15.36.46.png

One of the best British traditions is Live, and let live

The idea that politicians should pass a law, telling women what they can and cannot wear, is profoundly unBritish …(Brilliant!)a big step towards a police state!”


  • have any idea what he’s saying?
  • Did people actually vote for this guy?


he hangs himself even further. (You really should activate that link.)

Poor Nigel …


*  Prescribed (mandated) by law. No escape. (Islam adds a whole old dimension to the term ‘getting stoned’.


have the ‘ring of truth’ about it.



It demonstrates something, though—

—but I’ll leave it for you to figure out what that something may be.


a.  this is staged propaganda—they’ve done it well. Very well, dammit …

b.  this is genuine gospel truth—I too found it moving.


will this nice man stay forever behind his counter, being charitable, or will he storm into the mosque and kick over the money-changers’ tables (so to speak)?


a.  he stays behind his counter long enough he may well go broke …

b.  he storms into the mosque his life expectancy will drop rapidly to not much, and

c.  he’ll end up like these cheery followers—

Screen Shot 2016-10-26 at 12.57.32.png

—of the one True (merciful, compassionate etc etc) Faith and revealed word of God.

I apologise for recycling this image from my last post, it just seems so relevant. I should caption it Coming soon to a London or Washington or Paris or Malmo or Cologne or Madrid or Toulon or Sydney or Montreal or Lisbon or Auckland near you” and have done with it.

Make of it what you will, which predictably won’t be much until it’s too late. Probably won’t worry you much by then, but your kids will have to live with the Islamic Hydra …


Cute little fella, though, ain’t he just?